Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
slice VS splice VS shift: who is the fastest to keep constant size (bulk test)
(version: 0)
100k list splice and shift win, they mutate list slice loose, it creates a copy of list 7.5x slower
Comparing performance of:
slice vs splice vs shift
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var list = []; for (var i = 0; i < 1000 * 1000; i++) { list.push(i); }
Tests:
slice
list.push('slice'); list = list.slice(500);
splice
list.push('splice'); list.splice(0, 500);
shift
list.push('splice'); for (var i = 0; i < 500; i++) { list.shift(); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
slice
splice
shift
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what is tested on the website. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition represents a test case for comparing different approaches to manipulate a list in JavaScript. The specific task is to determine which approach (slice, splice, or shift) is the fastest to keep the list at its original size (bulk test). The description of the benchmark indicates that slice is the slowest method, followed by splice and shift. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code initializes an empty array `list` with 1 million elements using a loop. This creates a large dataset for testing. **Html Preparation Code** There is no HTML preparation code provided, which means that the benchmark does not involve any additional user interactions or DOM manipulations. **Individual Test Cases** Each test case represents a specific approach to manipulate the list: 1. **slice**: The script pushes an element onto the list and then uses `list.slice(500)` to create a copy of the first 500 elements. 2. **splice**: The script pushes an element onto the list and then uses `list.splice(0, 500)` to remove the first 500 elements. 3. **shift**: The script pushes an element onto the list and then uses a loop with 500 iterations to shift the last 500 elements to the beginning of the list. **Library Usage** None of the test cases explicitly use any JavaScript libraries. **Special JS Features or Syntax** The benchmark does not require any special JavaScript features or syntax. It only uses standard JavaScript methods like `push`, `slice`, `splice`, and `shift`. **Pros and Cons of Different Approaches** 1. **Slice**: The slowest method, as it creates a new copy of the list. Pros: creates a copy, reduces mutation. Cons: slower. 2. **Splice**: Faster than slice, but still modifies the original list. Pros: faster, reduces memory allocation. Cons: modifies original list. 3. **Shift**: The fastest method, as it only shifts elements within the existing list. Pros: fastest, no copying or modifying. Cons: requires additional loop iterations. **Other Considerations** The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of these three methods in a bulk test scenario. It's essential to note that this benchmark may not reflect real-world usage scenarios where lists are often used for individual elements rather than large datasets. **Alternatives** If you wanted to create similar benchmarks, you could consider using different test cases or modifying the existing ones to explore other aspects of list manipulation in JavaScript, such as: * Comparing the performance of various data structures (e.g., arrays vs. linked lists). * Evaluating the impact of array length on method performance. * Exploring the effects of caching or memoization on list manipulation methods. Keep in mind that measuring performance in a controlled environment like MeasureThat.net can provide valuable insights, but real-world scenarios might introduce additional factors to consider.
Related benchmarks:
slice VS splice: who is the fastest to keep constant size
slice VS splice VS shift: who is the fastest to keep constant size (fork no string push)
slice VS splice VS shift: who is the fastest to keep constant size 100
slice VS splice VS shift: who is the fastest to keep constant size [VARIANT]
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?