Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
JSON.parse VS string.split2
(version: 0)
JSON.parse VS string.split
Comparing performance of:
JSON.parse vs string.split
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
const testStringSplit = [] const testJSONParse = [] for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { testStringSplit.push(`${i},${i+1},${i+2}`) testJSONParse.push(`[${i},${i+1},${i+2}]`) }
Tests:
JSON.parse
const testStringSplit = [] const testJSONParse = [] for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { testStringSplit.push(`${i},${i+1},${i+2}`) testJSONParse.push(`[${i},${i+1},${i+2}]`) } testJSONParse.forEach(x=>JSON.parse(x))
string.split
const testStringSplit = [] const testJSONParse = [] for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { testStringSplit.push(`${i},${i+1},${i+2}`) testJSONParse.push(`[${i},${i+1},${i+2}]`) } testStringSplit.forEach(x=>x.split(','))
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
JSON.parse
string.split
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Benchmark Overview** The provided JSON represents a benchmark test case that compares the performance of two JavaScript methods: `string.split` and `JSON.parse`. The test creates an array of strings using `string.split`, and another array of JSON strings using `JSON.parse`. **Options Compared** There are two options being compared: 1. **String Split (`string.split`)**: This method splits a string into an array of substrings, separated by a specified delimiter (in this case, the comma `,`). 2. **JSON Parse (`JSON.parse`)**: This method parses a JSON string into a JavaScript object. **Pros and Cons** * `string.split`: * Pros: lightweight, easy to implement, and widely supported. * Cons: can be slower for large datasets due to the overhead of creating an array and iterating over its elements. * `JSON.parse`: * Pros: more efficient for large datasets, as it only requires parsing a single string into an object. * Cons: may require additional overhead if not handled correctly (e.g., handling invalid JSON strings). **Library Used** In the benchmark test case, `string.split` uses the built-in JavaScript method. However, in some cases, you might need to use a library like `lodash` or `split-string`, which provide more advanced string splitting capabilities. **Special JS Features/Syntax (Not Applicable)** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark test case. **Other Alternatives** If you want to compare other methods for parsing JSON, here are some alternatives: * **JSON.parse() with try-catch**: Wrapping `JSON.parse()` in a try-catch block can improve performance by avoiding the overhead of throwing an error when encountering invalid JSON. * **UglifyJS**: A popular JavaScript minifier that also provides a fast and efficient way to parse JSON strings. When choosing between these alternatives, consider factors such as your specific use case, data size, and performance requirements.
Related benchmarks:
JSON.parse vs string.split small array
JSON.parse vs string.split small fixed array
JSON.parse vs string.split 2
JSON.parse vs string.splitds
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?