Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Optional Chaining versus _.get lodash V2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Optional Chaining vs Lodash
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var obj = {a: {b: {c: {d: 1}}}} var badObj = {}
Tests:
Optional Chaining
obj.a?.b?.c?.d || 2 badObj.a?.b?.c?.d || 2
Lodash
_.get(obj, "a.b.c.d", 2) _.get(badObj, "a.b.c.d", 2)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Optional Chaining
Lodash
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks. **Benchmark Overview** The provided JSON represents a benchmark test case that compares two approaches for accessing nested properties in an object: Optional Chaining (ECMAScript 2020) and _.get() from Lodash, a popular utility library. **Options Compared** Two options are compared: 1. **Optional Chaining**: A new syntax introduced in ECMAScript 2020, which allows you to access nested properties using the nullish coalescing operator (`?.`). If the property is not present or its value is null or undefined, it returns the second operand (in this case, `2`). 2. **Lodash _.get()**: A utility function from Lodash that allows you to safely navigate nested objects and avoid null reference errors. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **Optional Chaining** * Pros: + More concise and expressive syntax. + Less error-prone, as it avoids the need for explicit checks. + Supported in modern browsers and JavaScript engines (ECMAScript 2020+). * Cons: + May be less readable for developers familiar with older syntaxes or libraries. 2. **Lodash _.get()** * Pros: + More flexible, as it allows you to provide a default value if the property is not present. + Works in environments where Optional Chaining is not supported (e.g., older browsers, Node.js). * Cons: + Requires an additional dependency on Lodash (a library that needs to be loaded and executed). **Lodash _.get() Library** _.get() is a utility function from Lodash that returns the value of a nested property in an object. It takes three arguments: 1. The object to search (`obj`) 2. A string representing the property path (e.g., "a.b.c.d") 3. An optional default value to return if the property is not present or its value is null or undefined In the benchmark, _.get() is used with `_.get(obj, "a.b.c.d", 2)` and `_.get(badObj, "a.b.c.d", 2)`, which attempts to access the nested property in both objects. **Special JavaScript Feature/Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes mentioned in this benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
_.get Benchmark Test
Optional Chaining versus _.get lodash (with obj in the optional chain test)
ES6 Optional Chaining vs TS Optional Chaining result in javascript vs vs. Lodash _.get
Optional Chaining versus _.get lodash without badObj
Lodash _.has vs Optional Chaining
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?