Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
es5 bind vs es6 arrow
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
bind vs arrow
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
class A { execute() { } callback1() {} callback2() {} } window.a = new A();
Tests:
bind
a.execute = function () { let bound1 = this.callback1.bind(this); let bound2 = this.callback2.bind(this); bound1(); bound2(); } a.execute();
arrow
a.execute = function () { let bound1 = () => this.callback1(); let bound2 = () => this.callback2(); bound1(); bound2(); } a.execute();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
bind
arrow
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 131 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=575741" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
arrow
61.8M/s
bind
60.2M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
arrow
61,758,584 Ops/sec
bind
60,242,852 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark. **What is being tested?** The benchmark compares two approaches to bind methods in JavaScript: 1. **ES5 bind**: The `bind` method is used to create a new function that has its `this` keyword bound to a specified value. 2. **ES6 arrow functions**: The `=>` syntax is used to define arrow functions, which also have their `this` keyword bound to the context in which they are defined. **Options being compared** The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches: * Using the `bind` method (ES5) to create a new function that binds its `this` keyword to the specified value. * Using arrow functions (ES6) to define methods that have their `this` keyword bound to the context in which they are defined. **Pros and Cons** ### ES5 bind Pros: * Wide support across different browsers and versions * Easy to understand and implement * Can be used to create complex function compositions Cons: * Can lead to unexpected behavior if not used correctly (e.g., binding `this` incorrectly) * May introduce performance overhead due to the creation of a new function object ### ES6 arrow functions Pros: * Simplifies method definitions and reduces boilerplate code * Expresses intent more clearly, making code easier to understand * Can lead to better performance due to reduced overhead from creating new function objects Cons: * Limited support across older browsers (e.g., Internet Explorer 11) * May not be as intuitive for developers who are not familiar with arrow functions **Library and syntax considerations** The benchmark uses the `callback1` and `callback2` methods, which are likely defined within the provided class definition. The purpose of these methods is to demonstrate how the binding approaches affect their execution. In this case, there are no notable library or syntax considerations, as both examples rely on standard JavaScript features. **Special JS feature or syntax** There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being used in this benchmark. Both examples only use the `bind` method and arrow functions, which are widely supported features in modern JavaScript. **Other alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches to binding methods, here are a few options: * **Using a wrapper function**: Instead of using the `bind` method or arrow functions, you can create a wrapper function that takes the context as an argument and calls the original method with the correct `this` value. * **Using closures**: You can use closures to encapsulate the method's implementation and ensure that the correct `this` value is used within the closure. * **Using a library or framework**: Some libraries, such as React or Angular, provide built-in support for binding methods through their APIs. In general, when choosing between these approaches, consider factors like performance, code readability, and compatibility across different browsers and versions.
Related benchmarks
bind-vs-arrow
Arrow function vs bind function
Arrow function vs bind function2021-reznik
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?