Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Last item access 1
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Slice vs Bracket
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Slice
const testArray = [1,2,3]; const newTestArray = testArray.slice(-1);
Bracket
const testArray = [1, 2, 3]; const newTestArray = testArray[testArray.length -1];
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Slice
Bracket
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what's being tested in the provided JSON. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is simply a JavaScript code snippet that creates an array `testArray` and then accesses the last item in one of two ways: 1. Using the `.slice()` method: `const newTestArray = testArray.slice(-1);` 2. Using bracket notation: `const newTestArray = testArray[testArray.length - 1];` These are essentially equivalent, as they both achieve the same result. **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: 1. `.slice()` method 2. Bracket notation (`[]` syntax) **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** * `.slice()`: This method is more explicit and allows for better control over the slice operation. It's also a built-in method, so it's likely to be faster and more efficient. + Pros: More flexible, potentially faster, and more predictable behavior. + Cons: May have slightly higher overhead due to its explicit nature. * Bracket notation (`[]` syntax): This is a shorthand way of accessing an array element. It's often seen in more concise code and can be easier to read. + Pros: Easier to write, potentially faster (due to being a simple lookup), and more concise. + Cons: Less explicit, may lead to errors if not used correctly. **Library** None of the provided benchmark definitions use any external libraries. The JavaScript standard library is sufficient for this test. **Special JS Features or Syntax** There are no special features or syntaxes being tested in these benchmarks. They're relatively basic and focus on comparing two simple array access methods. **Other Alternatives** If you were to reimplement one of these benchmarks, you could also consider testing: * Using `Array.prototype.at()` (a newer method introduced in ECMAScript 2019) * Using a library like Lodash's `at()` function * Testing the performance of using `Array.prototype[Symbol.iterator]()` instead of index-based access However, for this specific benchmark, the `.slice()` and bracket notation methods are good representatives of the basic array access patterns being compared. **Benchmark Preparation Code** The preparation code is empty, which means that the test cases start with a clean slate. This ensures that any performance differences can be attributed solely to the actual array access methods being tested.
Related benchmarks:
Array.map vs reduce
forEach vs reduce on nested values
Lodash vs. Set Intersection vs Array intersection 3
flatMap(spread, concat) vs reduce vs forEach
test 20230201.3 - includs
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?