Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
filtering out objects with flatmap vs filter
(version: 0)
flatMap vs filter map
Comparing performance of:
flatMap vs filter
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var arr = []; var i = 0; while (i <= 1E5) arr[i] = i++;
Tests:
flatMap
components = [ {__typename: 'ComponentDomainPagesCollectionGrid', test: 'test'}, {__typename: 'ComponentDomainArticlesCollectionGrid', test: 'test'}, {__typename: 'ComponentDomainEventsCollectionGrid', test: 'test'}, {__typename: 'DontListThisOne', test: 'test'}, {__typename: 'Also this', test: 'test'}, ] components.flatMap(c => { return c?.__typename === 'ComponentDomainPagesCollectionGrid' || c?.__typename === 'ComponentDomainArticlesCollectionGrid' || c?.__typename === 'ComponentDomainEventsCollectionGrid' ? [c] : [] })
filter
components = [ {__typename: 'ComponentDomainPagesCollectionGrid', test: 'test'}, {__typename: 'ComponentDomainArticlesCollectionGrid', test: 'test'}, {__typename: 'ComponentDomainEventsCollectionGrid', test: 'test'}, {__typename: 'DontListThisOne', test: 'test'}, {__typename: 'Also this', test: 'test'}, ] components.filter(c => { return c?.__typename === 'ComponentDomainPagesCollectionGrid' || c?.__typename === 'ComponentDomainArticlesCollectionGrid' || c?.__typename === 'ComponentDomainEventsCollectionGrid' })
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
flatMap
filter
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the provided benchmark definition and test cases. **Benchmark Definition Overview** The `filtering out objects with flatMap vs filter` benchmark compares the performance of two approaches: `flatMap` and `filter`. Both approaches are used to filter an array of objects based on a certain condition. The main difference between them lies in how they handle arrays within the filtered results. **Options Compared** 1. **flatMap**: This method returns a new array with all subarrays from the original array, or an empty array if no subarray is found. 2. **filter**: This method returns a new array with all elements that pass the test implemented by the provided function. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** * `flatMap`: + Pros: More concise and expressive code, handles arrays within filtered results elegantly. + Cons: Can be slower due to the creation of a new array, especially for large inputs. * `filter`: + Pros: Generally faster than `flatMap`, as it doesn't create a new array. + Cons: Code can become more verbose and less expressive. **Library Used** The benchmark definition uses the `__typename` property, which is typically used in GraphQL schema definitions to indicate the type of an object. In this case, it's used to filter objects based on their `__typename` value. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these test cases. The code is standard ECMAScript and uses only built-in methods like `flatMap`, `filter`, and array indexing. **Other Considerations** When deciding between `flatMap` and `filter`, consider the specific use case and performance requirements of your application. If you need to handle arrays within filtered results or want more concise code, `flatMap` might be a better choice. However, if speed is crucial and you don't need to process arrays within filtered results, `filter` could be a better option. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for filtering arrays in JavaScript include: * Using the `forEach` method with a callback function that returns a boolean value indicating whether an element should be included in the result. * Using the `every` and `some` methods to filter arrays based on multiple conditions. * Using third-party libraries like Lodash, which provides various filtering functions. Keep in mind that these alternatives might have their own performance characteristics and trade-offs compared to `flatMap` and `filter`.
Related benchmarks:
javascript array.filter().map() vs array.flatMap()
Array flatMap() vs filter().map()
flatMap() vs filter().map() - arrays
comparing flatMap vs filter and map in little arr length
Reduce Push vs. flatMap vs 123
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?