Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
String split using regex vs string
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Split by regex vs Split by string
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var string = 'salut comment ca va moi test pa adsk ldsj dkjasb kdaj akdajkda dkna dlkas mas '
Tests:
Split by regex
var res = string.split(/\s+/g)
Split by string
var str = string.split(' ') var res = [] for (var i = 0; i < str.length; i++) { var s = str[i].trim() if (s) { res.push(s) } }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Split by regex
Split by string
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is testing two approaches to splitting a string: using regular expressions (regex) and using the `split` method with a space character (`' '`) as the separator. **Options Compared** * **Regex**: The first option uses regex to split the string. The `/\\s+/g` pattern matches one or more whitespace characters (`\\s+`) globally (`g`) across the entire string. * **String Split Method**: The second option uses the `split` method with a space character as the separator. **Pros and Cons** * **Regex Approach**: + Pros: Can handle complex splitting scenarios, flexible pattern syntax, and can be used to extract specific substrings. + Cons: Can be slower than the string split method due to the overhead of parsing and executing regex patterns. Requires knowledge of regex syntax. * **String Split Method**: + Pros: Fast, lightweight, and easy to understand. + Cons: Limited flexibility, may not work as expected with edge cases or non-standard whitespace characters. **Library/Additional Considerations** There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that the regex approach uses a built-in JavaScript feature (regex patterns) to split the string. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The benchmark defines two test cases using special syntax: * `\\s+` in the regex pattern: This is a regex escape sequence for whitespace characters. * `\r\n`: This is a newline character. In this context, it's used as a separator in the string split method. **Other Alternatives** If you wanted to test alternative approaches, some options could be: * Using `replace()` with a callback function to split the string * Using a library like Lodash or underscore.js for string manipulation * Testing different string separators (e.g., tabs (`\t`), commas (`,`), etc.) * Adding more complex scenarios to handle edge cases (e.g., strings with newline characters, null/undefined values, etc.) Keep in mind that the choice of approach depends on the specific requirements and constraints of your project.
Related benchmarks:
String split using regex vs string v2
String split using regex vs string v3
Regex First Name split vs match - no console
regex vs split lucas ribeiro
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?