Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
instanceof vs namespaceURI
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
instanceof vs namespaceURI vs body.namespaceURI
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var svg = document.createElementNS("http://www.w3.org/2000/svg", "svg")
Tests:
instanceof
svg instanceof SVGElement
namespaceURI
svg.namespaceURI === "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"
body.namespaceURI
svg.namespaceURI === document.body.namespaceURI
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
instanceof
namespaceURI
body.namespaceURI
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmark and its results, explaining what's being tested, the options compared, their pros and cons, and other considerations. **Benchmark Description** The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of three different approaches for checking the namespace URI of an SVG element in JavaScript: 1. `svg instanceof SVGElement` 2. `svg.namespaceURI === "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"` 3. `svg.namespaceURI === document.body.namespaceURI` **Options Compared** The options compared are: A) Using the `instanceof` operator to check if an object is an instance of a specific constructor (`SVGElement` in this case). B) Directly comparing the namespace URI of an SVG element using a string literal ("http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"). C) Comparing the namespace URI of an SVG element with the namespace URI of the `body` element. **Pros and Cons** A) Using `instanceof`: This approach is concise and expressive, but it may not be as efficient as other methods, especially for large datasets. The `instanceof` operator checks if an object is a constructor's prototype chain, which can lead to slower performance. B) Direct comparison: This approach is simple and straightforward, but it has limitations. If the namespace URI changes, this comparison will fail. Additionally, comparing strings using the `===` operator involves additional overhead due to string normalization. C) Comparison with `body.namespaceURI`: This approach has similar pros and cons as B), but it also introduces an extra lookup operation by accessing the `namespaceURI` property of `document.body`. **Library Usage** There is no explicit library usage mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that some browsers (like Chrome) may use internal APIs or optimizations to compare namespace URIs. **Special JS Features/Syntax** None are explicitly mentioned. However, some features like `const` and `let` declarations, arrow functions, and template literals are not used in the benchmark code. This is a good sign, as it suggests that the test cases are focused on core JavaScript functionality rather than modern syntax or features. **Alternative Approaches** Other approaches to check the namespace URI of an SVG element could include: * Using `window(namespaceURI)` (not shown in the benchmark code) * Implementing a custom comparison function using the `String.prototype.normalize()` method * Utilizing browser-specific APIs, like `DOMTokenList` or `SVGElement::namespaceURI` property Keep in mind that these alternatives might have different performance characteristics, limitations, and compatibility across different browsers. Overall, the benchmark provides valuable insights into the relative performance of three distinct approaches for checking namespace URIs. By comparing these methods, users can choose the most efficient solution for their specific use case.
Related benchmarks:
typeof vs instanceof Function vs call
Instanceof vs property access
instanceof vs typeof gyuguyguy
instanceof vs typeof franco
instanceof vs typeof vs !!
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?