Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
for(by cache) vs foreach vs some vs every vs for..of vs map for large set
(version: 0)
Compare loop performance
Comparing performance of:
for vs foreach vs some vs every vs for..of vs map
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var array = new Array(1000000);
Tests:
for
const size = array.length; for (var i = 0; i < size; i++) { array[i]; }
foreach
array.forEach(function(i) { array[i]; });
some
array.some(function(i) { array[i]; });
every
array.every(function(i) { array[i]; });
for..of
for (var i of array) { array[i]; }
map
array.map(a => a);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (6)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
for
foreach
some
every
for..of
map
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what is being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark compares the performance of different loop constructs in JavaScript: 1. `for` loop 2. `forEach` loop 3. `some` loop 4. `every` loop 5. `for..of` loop (introduced in ECMAScript 2015) 6. `map` function The benchmark is designed to test the performance of each loop construct on a large array of 1,000,000 elements. **Loop Constructs** Here's a brief explanation of each loop construct: 1. **`for` loop**: A traditional loop that uses an explicit counter variable and increments it at each iteration. 2. **`forEach` loop**: A loop that iterates over an array or object using the `forEach` method, which calls a callback function for each element. 3. **`some` loop**: A loop that returns `true` as soon as a condition is met, otherwise returns `false`. It's often used with callbacks to check if any elements in an array meet a certain condition. 4. **`every` loop**: A loop that returns `true` only if all elements in an array meet a certain condition, otherwise returns `false`. 5. **`for..of` loop** (introduced in ECMAScript 2015): A new type of loop that iterates over arrays and other iterable objects using the `for...of` statement. 6. **`map` function**: A function that creates a new array with the results of applying a transformation to each element of an original array. **Library Used** The benchmark uses the `array` object, which is a built-in JavaScript object that represents an array. **Performance Comparison** The benchmark compares the performance of each loop construct by executing each one on the large array and measuring the time taken. The results are displayed in the format: * `RawUAString`: A string representing the user agent of the browser used to execute the test. * `Browser`: The name of the browser used to execute the test. * `DevicePlatform`: The device platform used to execute the test (e.g., Mobile). * `OperatingSystem`: The operating system used to execute the test (e.g., iOS 16.3). * `ExecutionsPerSecond`: The number of executions per second for each loop construct. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each loop construct: 1. **`for` loop**: Pros: simple, flexible; Cons: can be error-prone if not used carefully. 2. **`forEach` loop**: Pros: concise, easy to read; Cons: may have performance overhead due to callback function calls. 3. **`some` loop**: Pros: convenient for checking conditions; Cons: may return early, which can affect performance. 4. **`every` loop**: Pros: convenient for checking conditions; Cons: may return false if any elements fail the condition. 5. **`for..of` loop** (introduced in ECMAScript 2015): Pros: concise, easy to read; Cons: may have performance overhead due to array iteration. 6. **`map` function**: Pros: concise, easy to use; Cons: creates a new array, which can consume memory. **Special JavaScript Features** The benchmark uses the `for...of` loop and the `map` function, which are special features introduced in ECMAScript 2015. **Alternatives** If you need to implement loops or transformations on arrays, consider using: 1. **`forEach` method**: For iterating over arrays and executing callback functions for each element. 2. **`filter` method**: For creating a new array with elements that meet a certain condition. 3. **`reduce` method**: For reducing an array to a single value based on a transformation. Keep in mind that the choice of loop construct or function depends on the specific use case and performance requirements.
Related benchmarks:
map vs forEach Chris
map vs forEach Chris v2
map vs forEach Chris v2b
For loop vs <Array>.forEach() vs for...of loop
Array fill map, vs for i loop
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?