Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array push vs destruct
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Array.push vs Destruct and construct
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var arr = []; for(i=0; i<1000000; i++){ arr.push(1) }
Tests:
Array.push
arr = [...arr, 1]
Destruct and construct
arr = [...arr, 1]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.push
Destruct and construct
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. **What is tested?** The provided benchmark tests two approaches to adding elements to an array in JavaScript: 1. `Array.push()` 2. Destructuring and constructing a new array using the spread operator (`[...arr, 1]`) **Options compared:** We have two options being compared: * **Option 1: `Array.push()`**: This is a built-in method for adding elements to an array in JavaScript. It modifies the original array. * **Option 2: Destructuring and constructing a new array using `[...arr, 1]`**: This approach creates a new array by spreading the existing array and appending a new element. **Pros and Cons of each approach:** * **`Array.push()`**: + Pros: - Efficient for large arrays since it modifies the original array. - Typically faster due to its optimized implementation. + Cons: - Modifies the original array, which might be unintended behavior. - May not be suitable for certain use cases where preserving the original array is crucial. * **Destructuring and constructing a new array using `[...arr, 1]`**: + Pros: - Preserves the original array, making it more predictable and easier to reason about. - Does not modify the original array, which can be beneficial in certain scenarios. + Cons: - Typically slower due to the overhead of creating a new array and pushing elements into it. **Library/Utility usage:** There is no explicit library or utility being used in this benchmark. The `Array.push()` method is a built-in JavaScript function, while the spread operator (`[...arr, 1]`) is a feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). **Special JS features/syntax:** The benchmark uses the spread operator (`[...arr, 1]`), which is a ES6 feature. This syntax is used to create a new array by spreading an existing array and appending elements. **Other alternatives:** If you're looking for alternative approaches to adding elements to an array in JavaScript, here are a few options: * Using `concat()` method: `arr.concat([1])` * Using `Array.prototype.push.call(arr, 1)` * Using `slice().push(1)` However, it's worth noting that these alternatives may not be as efficient or readable as the original approaches being compared in this benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
Array .push() vs .unshift(), 1M elements
Array .push() vs .unshift(), 100K elements
Array .push() vs .unshift() multiple
arr unshift vs push + reverse (large array)
Array.push(x) vs array[n]=x
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?