Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Some vs. Filter vs. indexOf vs. Includes vs. Findrfhiehugiyerhug
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Array.some vs Array.filter vs Array.indexOf vs Array.includes vs Array.find
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var hasZero = []; var withoutZero = []; for (var i = 0; i < 60000; i++) { hasZero.push(Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000)); withoutZero.push(Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000) + 1) }
Tests:
Array.some
var tempResult = !!Math.round(Math.random()) ? hasZero.some(v => v === 0) : withoutZero.some(v => v === 0);
Array.filter
var tempResult = !!Math.round(Math.random()) ? hasZero.filter(v => v === 0) : withoutZero.filter(v => v === 0);
Array.indexOf
var tempResult = !!Math.round(Math.random()) ? hasZero.indexOf(0) > -1 : withoutZero.indexOf(0) > -1;
Array.includes
var tempResult = !!Math.round(Math.random()) ? hasZero.some(v => v === 0) : withoutZero.includes(v => v === 0);
Array.find
var tempResult = !!Math.round(Math.random()) ? hasZero.some(v => v === 0) : withoutZero.find(v => v === 0);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (5)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.some
Array.filter
Array.indexOf
Array.includes
Array.find
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmarking data and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is defined as a comparison between four different approaches to test if an array contains a specific value: 1. `Array.some()` 2. `Array.filter()` 3. `Array.indexOf()` 4. `Array.includes()` Each approach is tested in two directions: with the presence of the value and without it. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code generates two arrays, `hasZero` and `withoutZero`, each containing 60,000 random integers between 0 and 1000 (inclusive). The values in `hasZero` are guaranteed to be zero, while those in `withoutZero` will not. **Html Preparation Code** There is no HTML preparation code provided. **Individual Test Cases** Each test case has a unique benchmark definition, which can be broken down as follows: 1. `Array.some()`: Tests if the array contains at least one value equal to zero. * Pros: Simple and efficient for small arrays. * Cons: Can be slow for large arrays due to the need to iterate over all elements. 2. `Array.filter()`: Tests if the array contains exactly one value equal to zero. * Pros: Efficient for large arrays, as it only needs to process the filtered subset of elements. * Cons: Requires more memory and processing power compared to `some()` due to the need to create a new array. 3. `Array.indexOf()`: Tests if the array contains the first occurrence of zero (i.e., an index equal to 0). * Pros: Fast and efficient, as it only needs to perform a single iteration over the array. * Cons: Will return -1 if the value is not found, which may lead to unexpected results in certain contexts. 4. `Array.includes()`: Tests if the array contains at least one value equal to zero (similar to `some()`). * Pros: Similar to `some()`, but with a more modern and intuitive API. * Cons: May be slower than `indexOf()` due to its need to perform a linear search. **Library: null** There are no external libraries used in these benchmarking tests. **Special JS Feature/ Syntax: None** None of the test cases use any special JavaScript features or syntax that would require additional explanation. **Other Alternatives** Some alternative approaches could be explored, such as: 1. Using `Array.prototype.every()` instead of `some()`: This method returns true if all elements in the array pass the test. 2. Using `Array.prototype.includes()` with a custom callback function: This allows for more flexibility and control over the testing process. 3. Using a library like Lodash, which provides a range of utility functions for working with arrays. However, these alternatives are not included in the provided benchmarking data. Overall, this benchmarking test provides a useful comparison between four different approaches to testing array membership, highlighting their pros and cons, and potential implications for performance, memory usage, and developer experience.
Related benchmarks:
Some vs. Filter vs. indexOf vs Find
Some vs Filter vs indexOf vs Includes vs Find
Some vs. Filter vs. indexOf v includes
Some vs. Filter vs. indexOf vs Includes
Some vs. Filter vs. findIndex vs find
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?