Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Number conversions
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Unary operator vs Number vs parseInt
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Unary operator
+'1'
Number
Number('1')
parseInt
parseInt('1', 10)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Unary operator
Number
parseInt
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what is tested, compared, and other considerations. **Benchmark Definition**: The benchmark definition is a simple JavaScript expression: `'+1'`, `Number('1')`, or `parseInt('1', 10)`. These expressions perform unary arithmetic operations (adding 1), converting a string to a number, and parsing an integer from a string with a radix of 10. **Test Cases**: There are three test cases: 1. **Unary operator (`'+1'`)**: This expression uses the unary `+` operator to add 1 to the number 0. 2. **Number (`Number('1')`)**: This expression converts the string '1' to a number using the built-in `Number()` function. 3. **parseInt (`parseInt('1', 10)`)**: This expression parses the string '1' as an integer with a radix of 10. **Options Compared**: * In the unary operator case, there are no explicit options being compared, as it's a simple operation that doesn't require any input. * For `Number()` and `parseInt()`, the main options being compared are: + The number of executions per second (ExecutionsPerSecond) - This measures the performance of each test in terms of how many times the code is executed within a given time frame. + The raw UA string, browser, device platform, operating system, and other metadata - These provide context about the environment in which each benchmark was run. **Pros and Cons of Different Approaches**: * **Unary operator (`'+1'`)**: This approach is simple and straightforward. However, it may not be representative of real-world scenarios where unary operations are used. * **Number (`Number('1')`)**: Converting a string to a number is a common operation in JavaScript. This benchmark can provide insight into the performance of this operation. + Pros: Relevant to many use cases, provides information on numeric conversion efficiency. + Cons: May not accurately reflect real-world scenarios where more complex conversions are used. * **parseInt (`parseInt('1', 10)`)**: Parsing an integer from a string is another common operation in JavaScript. This benchmark can provide insight into the performance of this operation. + Pros: Relevant to many use cases, provides information on parsing efficiency with radix specification. + Cons: May not accurately reflect real-world scenarios where more complex parsing is used. **Library and Purpose**: None mentioned in the provided JSON. **Special JS Feature or Syntax**: There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned. However, note that `Number()` and `parseInt()` use a syntax specific to these built-in functions. **Other Considerations**: * The benchmark definition and test cases are simple and straightforward, making it easy to understand and compare the results. * The use of metadata (e.g., browser, device platform, operating system) provides context about the environment in which each benchmark was run, allowing for more informed comparisons. * The lack of input parameters or variables makes it simpler to execute and compare the tests. **Alternatives**: Some possible alternative benchmarks could include: * More complex numeric operations (e.g., arithmetic expressions with multiple numbers and operators). * String manipulation and formatting (e.g., concatenation, substring extraction). * Array-related operations (e.g., indexing, slicing, iteration). These alternatives would provide a more comprehensive view of JavaScript performance under different scenarios.
Related benchmarks:
Intl.NumberFormat vs toLocalString vs string split & reduce (with fraction digits) vs toFixed
Number format
Number Conversion Speed
Intl.NumberFormat vs existing way
Formatting number, including NaN
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?