Benchmark: Radash vs Native

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/radash/10.6.0/radash.min.js" integrity="sha512-eNaWPSoSKb+V6yv4UYsVvb2Vhgv+JvX0HVKeT07cZcTFUCtbOJx8dkDXDxwDGXLJx6ldihvBqQOxGaaZb4GElg==" crossorigin="anonymous" referrerpolicy="no-referrer"></script>

Script Preparation code:

  var data = _.range(10000).map(function(i) {
    return {
      counter: i
    }
  });
  
  function isOdd(num) {
    return num % 2 === 1;
  }
  
  function square(num) {
    return num * num;
  }
  
  function lessThanThreeDigits(num) {
    return num.toString().length < 3;
  }

Tests:

Radash
var result = _.chain(data) .map(item => item.counter) .filter(isOdd) .map(square) .filter(lessThanThreeDigits) .value();
Native
var result = data.map(item => item.counter) .filter(isOdd) .map(square) .filter(lessThanThreeDigits)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Radash
Native

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**Benchmark Overview**

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test on the MeasureThat.net website. The test compares two approaches: Radash and Native.

**Script Preparation Code Analysis**

The script preparation code defines several functions:

1. `isOdd(num)`: Returns whether a number is odd.
2. `square(num)`: Calculates the square of a number.
3. `lessThanThreeDigits(num)`: Checks if a number has fewer than three digits.

These functions are used in the benchmarking test to filter and transform data.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark definition contains two identical functions, but with slight differences:

1. Radash:
```javascript
var result = _.chain(data)
  .map(item => item.counter)
  .filter(isOdd)
  .map(square)
  .filter(lessThanThreeDigits)
  .value();
```
This uses the `_.chain()` method from the Lodash library to create a pipeline of operations.

2. Native:
```javascript
var result = data.map(item => item.counter)
  .filter(isOdd)
  .map(square)
  .filter(lessThanThreeDigits)
```
This is a more traditional, imperative approach without using `_.chain()`.

**Comparison Analysis**

The two approaches differ in their use of the Lodash library. Radash uses `_ chain()` to create a pipeline, while Native uses traditional array methods.

**Pros and Cons**

Radash (Lodash):

Pros:

* Provides a concise and readable way to perform complex data transformations.
* Can improve code maintainability by breaking down complex operations into smaller, reusable functions.

Cons:

* Requires the use of an external library (Lodash).
* May introduce additional overhead due to the creation of a new scope object (`_chain()`).

Native:

Pros:

* No additional overhead due to the absence of an external library.
* Can be more efficient for small datasets or performance-critical code paths.

Cons:

* Requires manual manipulation of arrays, which can lead to longer and less readable code.
* May result in fewer opportunities for code reuse and abstraction.

**Library Analysis**

The Lodash library is a popular utility function library that provides a wide range of functions for tasks such as data transformation, array manipulation, and more. In this case, `_chain()` is used to create a pipeline of operations, which simplifies the code and improves readability.

**JavaScript Features/Syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmarking test that require specific explanations.

**Alternatives**

Other alternatives for microbenchmarking tests include:

* V8 Benchmark Suite: A collection of benchmarks designed to measure the performance of various JavaScript engines.
* jsperf: A popular online tool for testing and comparing the performance of different JavaScript implementations.
* Benchmark.js: A lightweight, browser-based benchmarking library that provides a simple API for running microbenchmarks.

Keep in mind that the choice of alternative depends on the specific requirements and goals of your project.

Related benchmarks:

Radash vs Native (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Radash vs Native

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Radash

Native

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):