Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
lodash uniqueId vs crypto.randomUUID
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
lodash vs ES
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
lodash
_.uniqueId()
ES
crypto.randomUUID()
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
lodash
ES
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
8 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/135.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 OPR/120.0.0.0 (Edition Yx 08)
Browser/OS:
Opera 120 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=616756" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Test name
Executions per second
lodash
215855696.0 Ops/sec
ES
2123469.2 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to help you understand what's being tested in the provided benchmark. **What is being tested?** MeasureThat.net is testing two different approaches to generating unique identifiers: `_uniqueId()` from the Lodash library and `crypto.randomUUID()` from the Node.js built-in `crypto` module. **Options compared** The two options are: 1. **_uniqueId() from Lodash**: This function generates a unique identifier as a string. It's designed to be cryptographically secure, but its security guarantees may not be suitable for all use cases. 2. **crypto.randomUUID() from Node.js**: This function generates a random UUID (Universally Unique Identifier) as a string. It's designed to be cryptographically secure and is widely used in Node.js applications. **Pros and Cons of each approach** 1. **_uniqueId() from Lodash**: * Pros: Easy to use, fast, and well-tested. * Cons: Not suitable for cryptographic purposes (e.g., generating unique tokens), may not be as secure as other options. 2. **crypto.randomUUID() from Node.js**: * Pros: Cryptographically secure, widely adopted, and suitable for most use cases. * Cons: May not be as fast as _uniqueId(), requires additional dependencies. **Library used** The `lodash` library is a popular utility library that provides a wide range of functions for various tasks. In this benchmark, `_uniqueId()` is used to generate unique identifiers. **Special JS feature or syntax** There isn't any special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing the performance and security of two different approaches to generating unique identifiers. **Other alternatives** If you need a more secure or fast way to generate unique identifiers, you may consider using other libraries or modules, such as: * `uuid`: A popular library for generating UUIDs. * `crypto-js`: A library that provides cryptographic functions, including UUID generation. * Custom implementations using algorithms like the Hash-based Message Authentication Code (HMAC). Keep in mind that the choice of library or implementation depends on your specific use case and requirements.
Related benchmarks:
lodash uniq vs native uniq
uniqBy vs stringify performance
Math.random vs crypto.getRandomValues vs uuid
set.has vs. array.includes - 1000 UUIDs
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?