Benchmark: Shuffled TC-DOHSIM find vs for...of

HTML Preparation code:

<div id='test'></div>

Tests:

for..of
function shuffleArray(array) { for (var i = array.length - 1; i > 0; i--) { var j = Math.floor(Math.random() * (i + 1)); var temp = array[i]; array[i] = array[j]; array[j] = temp; } return array; } var res = 850; var val = res; var arr = shuffleArray([1000, 600, 800]); for (var value of arr.sort((a, b) => a - b)) { val = res > value ? value : val; break; }
Array.find()
function shuffleArray(array) { for (var i = array.length - 1; i > 0; i--) { var j = Math.floor(Math.random() * (i + 1)); var temp = array[i]; array[i] = array[j]; array[j] = temp; } return array; } var res = 850; var val = res; var arr = shuffleArray([1000, 600, 800]); val = arr.sort((a, b) => b - a).find(value => res > value) || res;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
for..of
Array.find()

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark compares two approaches for finding the maximum value in an array: `for...of` loop and `Array.find()` method.

**Options Compared**

Two options are compared:

1. **For...of loop**: A traditional approach using a `for...of` loop to iterate over the sorted array.
2. **Array.find() method**: A modern approach using the `find()` method, which returns the first element in an array that satisfies the provided testing function.

**Pros and Cons**

**For...of loop:**

Pros:

* Well-established and widely supported syntax
* Easy to understand and maintain
* Can be optimized for specific use cases

Cons:

* Slow performance due to the iteration over the entire array
* May not be as efficient as other approaches

**Array.find() method:**

Pros:

* Fast performance, as it uses a more efficient algorithm
* Easy to read and write, especially for those familiar with functional programming concepts

Cons:

* Less widely supported syntax, although it's been added to ECMAScript 2019 (ES10)
* May require additional imports or configurations in some environments

**Library Used**

In both benchmark cases, the `shuffleArray()` function is used to shuffle the input array. This function is not a built-in JavaScript library but rather an implementation provided by MeasureThat.net.

The `Array.find()` method relies on the ECMAScript 2019 standard (ES10), which includes this method.

**Special JS Features/Syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes used in these benchmark cases, as they rely on well-established and widely supported built-in methods.

**Other Alternatives**

If you'd like to explore alternative approaches for finding the maximum value in an array:

1. **Reduce() method**: Instead of using `for...of` or `Array.find()`, you can use the `reduce()` method, which accumulates a value by applying a provided function against an accumulator and each element in the array.
```javascript
arr.reduce((max, current) => max > current ? max : current)
```
2. **Spread operator**: You can also use the spread operator (`...`) to create a new array with only the maximum value.
```javascript
[...arr].sort((a, b) => b - a)[0]
```
Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics and usage scenarios compared to `for...of` or `Array.find()`.

I hope this explanation helps you understand the benchmark and provides a solid foundation for exploring JavaScript microbenchmarks!

Related benchmarks:

Shuffled TC-DOHSIM find vs for...of (version: 0)

Testing DOHSIM shuffled performance of find vs for

Comparing performance of: for..of vs Array.find()

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

for..of

Array.find()

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):