Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Simple Array Find vs Includes
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Performance Array Find vs Performance Array Includes
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Performance Array Find
['Rafael', 'Otavio', 'Vitoria', 'Marcelo', 'Giovanna', 'Roberto', 'Fernanda', 'José', 'Joseph', 'Pedrinho', 'Lindinha', 'Irineu', 'Valdir', 'Holanda'].find((item) => item === 'Holanda')
Performance Array Includes
['Rafael', 'Otavio', 'Vitoria', 'Marcelo', 'Giovanna', 'Roberto', 'Fernanda', 'José', 'Joseph', 'Pedrinho', 'Lindinha', 'Irineu', 'Valdir', 'Holanda'].includes('Holanda')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Performance Array Find
Performance Array Includes
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark JSON and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The `Benchmark Definition` represents the test case itself. In this case, there are two test cases: 1. "Performance Array Find" 2. "Performance Array Includes" Both test cases use an array of strings (`['Rafael', 'Otavio', 'Vitoria', ...]`) and search for a specific element using the `find()` or `includes()` methods. **Options Compared** In this benchmark, two options are being compared: 1. `find()`: This method returns the first element that satisfies the provided condition (in this case, `'Holanda'`). If no element matches, it returns `undefined`. 2. `includes()`: This method checks if a specific value exists in the array and returns a boolean result (`true` or `false`). **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **`find()`**: * Pros: More concise and expressive way to find a single element that matches the condition. * Cons: May be slower than `includes()` because it needs to iterate through the array until it finds the match. 2. **`includes()`**: * Pros: Faster and more efficient, especially for larger arrays, since it uses a linear search algorithm under the hood. * Cons: Less concise and more verbose than `find()`, as you need to specify the value to search for. **Library Used** In both test cases, no specific library is being used. The `Array.prototype.find()` and `Array.prototype.includes()` methods are part of the JavaScript standard library. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being used in these test cases beyond what's already mentioned (i.e., `find()` and `includes()`). **Other Alternatives** If you were to implement a custom solution, some alternative approaches could be: * Using a traditional linear search algorithm, iterating through the array manually. * Using a binary search algorithm, which is more efficient for large arrays but has higher overhead due to its complexity. However, in this benchmark, `find()` and `includes()` are already optimized by JavaScript's standard library, making them suitable choices for performance comparison. **Benchmark Preparation Code** The provided JSON doesn't include any script preparation code. It seems that the test cases are self-contained and don't require any additional setup or initialization. Overall, this benchmark provides a simple and straightforward way to compare the performance of `find()` and `includes()` methods in JavaScript, helping developers understand which approach is more suitable for specific use cases.
Related benchmarks:
find vs includes
IndexOf vs Includes vs find
array indexOf vs includes vs some v3
find vs includes vs indexof
#2 Array Includes vs. Find
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?