Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator to copy array
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional slice() method
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.slice
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = params.slice();
spread operator
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] var other = [ ...params ]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.slice
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The test measures the performance difference between two methods to copy an array: `Array.prototype.slice()` and the ES6 spread operator (`[...]`). **Options Compared** There are only two options being compared: 1. **`Array.prototype.slice()`**: A traditional method for creating a shallow copy of an array. 2. **ES6 Spread Operator (`[...]`)**: A new syntax introduced in ECMAScript 2015 that allows for more concise way to create arrays by spreading elements from another iterable. **Pros and Cons** - **`Array.prototype.slice()`** + Pros: - Widely supported across browsers and older JavaScript engines. - Easy to understand and implement. + Cons: - Can be slower compared to the spread operator due to the overhead of creating a new array. - May not perform well with large arrays or deep copies. - **ES6 Spread Operator (`[...]`)** + Pros: - Faster execution time for copying arrays, especially for shallow copies. - More concise and readable syntax. + Cons: - Requires support from modern browsers and JavaScript engines. Older versions might not execute this syntax correctly. - Might cause unexpected behavior if used incorrectly. **Library and Special JS Features** There are no libraries or special JavaScript features explicitly mentioned in the benchmark. However, it's worth noting that the spread operator is a part of the ECMAScript standard and has been widely adopted across modern browsers and JavaScript engines. **Other Considerations** When choosing between these two options, consider the following: - **Array size**: For small arrays, the difference might be negligible. However, for larger arrays, the spread operator may be faster. - **Deep copies**: If you need to create a deep copy of an array (i.e., recursively copying nested objects), `Array.prototype.slice()` might not be sufficient, and other methods like `JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj))` or libraries like Lodash's `cloneDeep` would be needed. **Alternatives** If you need to compare other array creation methods, consider the following alternatives: - **`Array.from()`**: A modern method for creating an array from an iterable. It can be faster than `slice()` but slower than the spread operator. - **`concat()`**: Another traditional method for concatenating arrays. While it's similar to `slice()`, its performance can vary depending on the size of the input array. - **`Array.prototype.reduce()`**: A method that creates an array by accumulating values from an initial value using a reducer function. This approach can be more efficient than `concat()` or `slice()`, especially for larger datasets. Keep in mind that these alternatives might not offer significant performance improvements over the spread operator and should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, considering factors like readability, maintainability, and compatibility with older browsers.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator.
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator With slightly bigger array
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator for Array copy
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator on a bigger array
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator - large array 100000
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?