Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
or operator vs array.find
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
or operator vs array
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var a = false, b = true;
Tests:
or operator
var c = a || b;
array
var d = [a, b].find((element) => element);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
or operator
array
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 131 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=567521" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
or operator
11.2M/s
array
10.8M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
or operator
11,235,165 Ops/sec
array
10,782,284 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Definition and Preparation Code** The provided JSON represents a benchmark definition for two test cases: 1. The "or operator" test case, which compares the performance of using the logical OR operator (`||`) to evaluate expressions. 2. The "array" test case, which compares the performance of using the `find` method with an array to find elements that meet a certain condition. The script preparation code for both test cases is identical: ```javascript var a = false; var b = true; ``` This code defines two boolean variables, `a` and `b`, and initializes them to their respective values. This setup allows the benchmark to focus on comparing different approaches to evaluate expressions. **Options Compared** The "or operator" test case compares the performance of using the logical OR operator (`||`) versus an array-based approach. The "array" test case compares the performance of using `find` with an array to find elements that meet a certain condition. **Pros and Cons of Different Approaches:** 1. **Logical OR Operator (||)**: * Pros: Simple, widely supported, and efficient. * Cons: May not be as readable or maintainable in some cases, especially for complex conditions. 2. **Array-Based Approach (`find` method)**: * Pros: More flexible and readable than the logical OR operator, allows for more complex conditions. * Cons: May have performance overhead due to the need to create an array and iterate over its elements. **Library Used** None is explicitly mentioned in the provided JSON. However, it's likely that the `find` method used in the "array" test case relies on JavaScript's built-in Array prototype or a library like Lodash. **Special JS Feature/ Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes mentioned in the provided code snippets. The focus is on comparing different approaches to evaluate expressions, not showcasing specific language features. **Other Considerations** When writing benchmarks, it's essential to consider factors beyond just performance, such as: * Code readability and maintainability * Support for various browsers and environments * Robustness against edge cases In this case, the benchmark definition is straightforward, but other considerations might be necessary depending on the specific use case or requirements. **Alternative Approaches** Other alternatives to the logical OR operator or array-based approach could include: * Using a conditional statement (e.g., `if` or `switch`) instead of `||`. * Utilizing a more specialized library or function, such as `booleanValue` from Lodash. * Implementing a custom evaluation mechanism using a different data structure or algorithm. Keep in mind that the choice of alternative approach depends on the specific requirements and constraints of the project.
Related benchmarks
set vs array find if exists
#2 Array Includes vs. Find
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?