Benchmark: Moment Unix vs Vanilla Javascript

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/moment.js/2.29.1/moment.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var now = "" + new Date().getTime() / 1000;

var createdDate = null;

Tests:

Moment
createdDate = moment.unix(+now).toDate();
Javascript
createdDate = new Date(+now * 1000);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Moment
Javascript

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/120.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 120 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Moment	1283157.2 Ops/sec
Javascript	2746564.2 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.

**What is tested?**

The provided benchmark tests two approaches to converting a Unix timestamp (a number representing seconds since January 1, 1970, 00:00:00 UTC) to a Date object in JavaScript. The first approach uses the Moment.js library, while the second approach uses native JavaScript functions.

**Options compared:**

We have two options:

1. **Moment.js**: A popular JavaScript library for working with dates and times. It provides an easy-to-use API for converting Unix timestamps to Date objects.
2. **Vanilla JavaScript**: The standard JavaScript library that comes with every browser, allowing us to create our own Date object from a Unix timestamp.

**Pros and Cons:**

1. **Moment.js**:
	* Pros:
		+ Easy to use and understand
		+ Provides a consistent API across different browsers
		+ Supports various date formats and time zones
	* Cons:
		+ Adds an extra dependency (the library itself) that can impact page load times
		+ May not be suitable for very large-scale applications due to its overhead
2. **Vanilla JavaScript**:
	* Pros:
		+ No additional dependencies, keeping the page load time light
		+ Can be optimized for specific use cases
	* Cons:
		+ Requires more expertise in JavaScript and its nuances
		+ May not provide a consistent API across browsers

**Library used: Moment.js**

Moment.js is a widely-used library that provides an easy-to-use API for working with dates and times. It's particularly useful when dealing with complex date calculations or formatting requirements.

**Special JS feature or syntax:**

There doesn't appear to be any special JavaScript features or syntax being tested in this benchmark. Both approaches rely on standard JavaScript functions (Date() and its methods).

**Other alternatives:**

If you're looking for alternative libraries or native JavaScript approaches, here are a few options:

1. **Lux**: A lightweight date library that provides similar functionality to Moment.js.
2. **Day.js**: Another popular date library that offers a more concise API than Moment.js.
3. **Native Date() with ISO 8601 parsing**: You can use the `Date()` constructor and pass an ISO 8601-formatted string (e.g., "2022-01-01T12:00:00Z") to create a Date object from a Unix timestamp.

Keep in mind that these alternatives might not offer the same ease of use as Moment.js, but they can provide more control over the parsing process or be more lightweight for specific use cases.

Related benchmarks:

Moment Unix vs Vanilla Javascript (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Moment vs Javascript

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Moment

Javascript

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):