Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Convert String to Number parseInt vs +
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
parseInt Conversion vs + Conversion
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var testString = "100000"; var testNumber = null;
Tests:
parseInt Conversion
testNumber = Number.parseInt(testString);
+ Conversion
testNumber = +testString
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
parseInt Conversion
+ Conversion
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what is being tested, compared, and the pros/cons of each approach. **What is being tested?** MeasureThat.net is testing two different ways to convert a string to a number in JavaScript: using the `parseInt()` function and using the unary plus operator (`+`). The test cases are designed to measure which method is faster for large strings. The first test case uses `parseInt()` to convert a string to a number, while the second test case uses the unary plus operator (`+`) to achieve the same result. **Options compared** There are two main options being compared: 1. **`parseInt()` function**: This function converts a string to a number by parsing it according to a radix (base). The default radix is 10 for decimal numbers. 2. **Unary plus operator (`+`)**: This operator coerces the value of an expression to a number. **Pros and cons** 1. `parseInt()` function: * Pros: + Can handle strings in different bases (e.g., hexadecimal, octal). + Returns `NaN` if the string cannot be converted to a number. * Cons: + Can be slower than using the unary plus operator for simple decimal conversions. 2. Unary plus operator (`+`): * Pros: + Fast and efficient for simple decimal conversions. + Does not return `NaN` like `parseInt()` does if the conversion fails. * Cons: + Does not handle strings in different bases. **Library usage** None of the test cases use any external libraries. **Special JavaScript feature or syntax** The test case uses a special JavaScript feature called **"Raw UA String"**, which is used to specify the user agent (browser) string. This allows MeasureThat.net to analyze data from different browsers and operating systems. However, if we look at the individual test cases, there are no specific mentions of any special JavaScript features or syntax being tested. **Other alternatives** If you were to create similar benchmarks for other operations, here are some alternative approaches: * Converting a string to uppercase or lowercase. * Checking if a value is an integer using `Number.isInteger()`. * Using template literals (`${value}`) instead of concatenation or `+` for simple string manipulations. Keep in mind that these alternatives would require creating new test cases and adjusting the benchmark preparation code accordingly.
Related benchmarks:
ParseInt vs Number conversion
parseInt vs Number parsing
Number vs + vs parseFloat 235
string to number convert
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?