Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
slice vs new allocation
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Slice vs Length - 1
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var arr = []; for (let i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) { arr.push(i); }
Tests:
Slice
let a = []; for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { a.push(arr.slice(i * 10, 1000)); }
Length - 1
let a = []; for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { a.push(Array.from(arr.slice(i * 10, 1000))); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Slice
Length - 1
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and its test cases. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a JSON object that describes the test case. In this case, it defines two test cases: "Slice" and "Length - 1". The script preparation code is provided to create an array `arr` with 1 million elements, and then populate it with values from 0 to 999999. **Test Cases** There are two test cases: ### Test Case 1: Slice The benchmark definition for this test case is: ```javascript let a = []; for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { a.push(arr.slice(i * 10, 1000)); } ``` This code creates an array `a` and then pushes to it 1000 slices of the original array `arr`, starting from index 10 to 9999. The `slice()` method is used to extract a subset of elements from `arr`. ### Test Case 2: Length - 1 The benchmark definition for this test case is: ```javascript let a = []; for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { a.push(Array.from(arr.slice(i * 10, 1000))); } ``` This code creates an array `a` and then pushes to it 1000 elements converted from the slices of `arr`, using the `Array.from()` method. The `slice()` method is still used to extract subsets of elements from `arr`. **Comparison** In both test cases, the goal is to measure the performance difference between slicing an array and using a different approach to create a new array. **Options Compared** The options compared are: 1. Slicing an array using `slice()` 2. Using `Array.from()` to convert slices of an array into a new array **Pros and Cons** * **Slicing an Array (Method 1)**: + Pros: Efficient for large arrays, as it only copies the necessary elements. + Cons: May be slower for small arrays due to the overhead of creating a slice object. * **Using `Array.from()` (Method 2)**: + Pros: Faster for small arrays due to the use of optimized array creation algorithms. + Cons: May be slower for large arrays due to the need to create multiple intermediate arrays. **Library and Special JS Feature** Neither of these options relies on a specific JavaScript library or special feature. The `Array.from()` method is a standard method in modern JavaScript, introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). **Considerations** When choosing between slicing an array and using `Array.from()`, consider the size of the array and the performance requirements of your application. * For large arrays, slicing may be more efficient due to the reduced overhead. * For small arrays, using `Array.from()` may provide faster execution times. **Other Alternatives** There are other ways to create a new array from a slice or an original array: 1. Using `map()`: `arr.slice(i * 10, 1000).map(x => x)` 2. Using a `for...of` loop: `for (let i of arr.slice(i * 10, 1000)) { ... }` 3. Using `reduce()`: `arr.slice(i * 10, 1000).reduce((acc, curr) => acc.concat(curr), [])` However, these alternatives may not be as efficient or expressive as slicing and using `Array.from()`. I hope this explanation helps!
Related benchmarks:
slice vs new allocation1
slice vs new allocation2
slice vs new allocation3
Array Slicing
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?