Benchmark: Object.assisn vs Spread

Script Preparation code:

var A = {
  name: 'John', 
  age: 20, 
  job: 'developer'
};

var B = {
  email: 'test@test.com', 
  address: 'Seoul', 
  job: 'doctor'
};

Tests:

Object.assign
var result = Object.assign({}, A, B); console.log(result)
Spread
var result = {...{}, ...A, ...B}; console.log(result)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Object.assign
Spread

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases.

**Benchmark Definition Overview**

The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches for merging objects in JavaScript: `Object.assign()` and the spread operator (`...`).

**Script Preparation Code**

The script preparation code defines two objects, `A` and `B`, which contain similar properties but with different names. For example, `A` has a `job` property, while `B` has an `email` property.

```javascript
var A = {
  name: 'John',
  age: 20,
  job: 'developer'
};

var B = {
  email: 'test@test.com',
  address: 'Seoul',
  job: 'doctor'
};
```

**Html Preparation Code**

There is no HTML preparation code provided, which suggests that this benchmark only tests the JavaScript engine's performance and does not consider factors like DOM rendering or network latency.

**Individual Test Cases**

The test cases are designed to measure the execution time of two different approaches for merging objects:

1. `Object.assign()`: This approach uses the `Object.assign()` method to merge the properties of `A` and `B` into a new object.
```javascript
var result = Object.assign({}, A, B);
console.log(result);
```
2. Spread Operator (`...`): This approach uses the spread operator to merge the properties of `A` and `B` into a new object.
```javascript
var result = {...{}, ...A, ...B};
console.log(result);
```

**Pros and Cons**

**Object.assign()**

* Pros:
	+ Widely supported by most JavaScript engines.
	+ Can be used to merge multiple objects into one.
* Cons:
	+ May not work as expected if the input objects have a `toString()` method that returns a value other than `"[object Object]"`.
	+ Can be slower for very large object sizes due to its iteration-based approach.

**Spread Operator (`...`)**

* Pros:
	+ Faster and more efficient than `Object.assign()` for small to medium-sized objects.
	+ More readable code.
* Cons:
	+ Not supported by older JavaScript engines (e.g., Internet Explorer 11).
	+ May not work as expected if the input objects have a `toString()` method that returns a value other than `"[object Object]"`.

**Library Used**

There is no library used in this benchmark. The comparison is between two built-in JavaScript features.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax**

The spread operator (`...`) is a relatively new feature introduced in ECMAScript 2018 (ES2018). It allows for more concise and expressive code when merging objects, but may not be supported by all browsers or older versions of JavaScript engines.

**Other Alternatives**

Other alternatives to `Object.assign()` and the spread operator include:

1. Object.create() + assignment: This approach creates a new object using `Object.create()` and then assigns properties from `A` and `B` using the dot notation (`objProp = A.prop; objProp2 = B.prop2;`).
```javascript
var result = Object.create(null);
result.name = A.name;
result.age = A.age;
result.job = B.job;
console.log(result);
```
2. For...of loop: This approach uses a `for...of` loop to iterate over the properties of `A` and `B` and assign them to a new object.
```javascript
var result = {};
for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(A)) {
  result[key] = value;
}
for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(B)) {
  if (!result[key]) {
    result[key] = value;
  }
}
console.log(result);
```
These alternatives are more verbose and may not be as efficient as `Object.assign()` or the spread operator, but can still be useful in certain scenarios.

Related benchmarks:

Object.assisn vs Spread (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Object.assign vs Spread

Created: 3 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Object.assign

Spread

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):