Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
counter (str.match vs str.split)
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
String.split vs Regex.match
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
string = "{{This is a ben{{chmark to test if matching a regex is faster{{ that splitti{{ng a string";
Tests:
String.split
(string.split("{{").length - 1)
Regex.match
(string.match(/{{/g)||[]).length
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
String.split
Regex.match
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.1:latest
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what's being tested and the results. **Benchmark Name:** The benchmark is called "counter (str.match vs str.split)" which implies that it's comparing the performance of two different methods: `String.match()` with regular expressions, and `String.split()`. **Test Cases:** There are two test cases: 1. **"String.split"**: This test case uses the `String.split()` method to split a string containing the characters "{{". The benchmark definition is `(string.split("{{").length - 1)`, which means it's splitting the string at each occurrence of "{{" and then subtracting 1 from the resulting array length. 2. **"Regex.match"**: This test case uses the `String.match()` method with a regular expression to match all occurrences of "{{" in the same string. The benchmark definition is `(string.match(/{{/g)||[]).length`, which means it's using a regex pattern `/{{/g` (global match) to find all occurrences of "{{", and then taking the length of the resulting array. **Results:** The results show that: * "String.split" executed approximately 1.3 times faster than "Regex.match" on Chrome 108 on Windows Desktop. **What's being compared:** In this benchmark, two methods are being compared: 1. **`String.split()`**: This method splits a string into an array of substrings based on a separator (in this case, "{{"). 2. **`String.match()` with regex**: This method uses a regular expression to find all occurrences of a pattern in the string. **Pros and Cons:** * `String.split()`: Pros: + Often faster for simple splitting operations. + Easier to read and understand for non-regex users. * `String.match()` with regex: Pros: + More powerful and flexible, allowing complex patterns and global matching. + Can be used for tasks beyond simple string manipulation. **Considerations:** When choosing between `String.split()` and `String.match()`, consider: 1. Complexity of the split operation: If you need to split a string at multiple separators or with complex logic, `String.split()` might not be suitable. 2. Regular expression skills: If your team has expertise in regular expressions, using `String.match()` can lead to more concise and readable code. **Other Alternatives:** While this benchmark focuses on `String.split()` vs `String.match()`, there are other alternatives for similar tasks: 1. **`Array.prototype.map()`**: Can be used for transformations that require splitting the string into an array. 2. **Regular expression replace**: If you need to perform a more complex operation, consider using `String.replace()` with a regex. Keep in mind that this benchmark is specific to measuring performance differences between two methods on a particular browser version and platform. When choosing between alternatives, consider your team's expertise, the complexity of the task, and the readability of the code.
Related benchmarks:
str.match vs str.Split33
str.match vs str.Split3322
str.match vs str.split vs deconstruction
split vs memoize
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?