Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Extend Array
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
equality vs type
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
equality
const test = "" test === undefined
type
const test = "" typeof test === undefined
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
equality
type
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and its results. **What is being tested?** The benchmark tests two different approaches to checking if a variable `test` is undefined: 1. **Equality**: The first test case checks if `test` is equal to an empty string using the `===` operator. 2. **Type**: The second test case checks if the type of `test` is undefined using the `typeof` operator. **Options compared** In this benchmark, two options are being compared: 1. **Equality check**: Using the `===` operator to check if a value is equal to another value. 2. **Type check**: Using the `typeof` operator to check the type of a variable. **Pros and Cons of each approach:** **Equality Check (===)** Pros: * Simple and straightforward * Well-supported by most JavaScript engines Cons: * Can be slow for large arrays or objects, since it involves creating a new object reference. * May not work as expected in some edge cases (e.g., NaN vs. non-NaN values) **Type Check (typeof)** Pros: * Faster than equality checks for simple types like numbers, strings, and booleans * More robust for checking the type of an object Cons: * Less straightforward than equality checks * May return unexpected results in some cases (e.g., `typeof NaN` returns `"number"`) **Other considerations:** In modern JavaScript, it's generally recommended to use strict equality (`===`) instead of loose equality (`==`). This is because `==` can lead to unexpected behavior due to type coercion. The `typeof` operator has its own set of quirks and edge cases. For example, `typeof NaN` returns `"number"`, which might not be what you expect. **Library usage** In this benchmark, there is no explicit library usage. The tests only rely on built-in JavaScript operators. **Special JS feature or syntax: None mentioned** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these tests. **Alternatives** For measuring performance and comparing different approaches, other alternatives include: 1. MicroBenchmark.js (another popular benchmarking framework) 2. Benchmark.js (a high-performance benchmarking library) 3. jsbench (a simple, intuitive benchmarking tool) Keep in mind that each alternative has its own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice ultimately depends on your specific use case and requirements. I hope this explanation helps!
Related benchmarks:
Big Array prepend
Merge 3 small arrays
new Array using spreading operator vs Array.slice()
t9834yt9h43
Merging two arrays
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?