Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Spreads vs concats
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Concat vs Spread
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Concat
const arrayOne = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20] const arrayTwo = [21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 30] const result = arrayOne.concat(arrayTwo)
Spread
const arrayOne = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20] const arrayTwo = [21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 30] const result = [...arrayOne, ...arrayTwo]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Concat
Spread
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain the benchmark and its options. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark compares two approaches for concatenating arrays: using the `concat()` method and using the spread operator (`...`). **Options Compared** 1. **Concat() Method**: This approach uses the `concat()` method to concatenate two arrays. 2. **Spread Operator**: This approach uses the spread operator (`...`) to concatenate two arrays. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **Concat() Method** * Pros: + Widely supported and well-documented in most browsers. + Can handle large datasets without performance issues. * Cons: + May be slower than the spread operator due to its overhead. 2. **Spread Operator** * Pros: + Faster and more efficient than the `concat()` method. + Only added in ECMAScript 2015, so it's supported by modern browsers. * Cons: + Less widely supported in older browsers (before ECMAScript 2015). + May require explicit declaration of variables for compatibility. **Library and Syntax Used** No libraries are used in this benchmark. The syntax is standard JavaScript, specifically: * `concat()` method: `array1.concat(array2)` * Spread operator: `[...array1, ...array2]` **Special JS Feature or Syntax** The spread operator (`...`) is a new feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). It allows for efficient concatenation of arrays without the need for explicit method calls. **Other Considerations** When choosing between these two approaches, consider the following factors: * **Performance**: If you're working with large datasets or performance-critical code, the spread operator may be a better choice. * **Browser Support**: If you need to support older browsers (before ECMAScript 2015), the `concat()` method is safer. * **Readability and Maintainability**: The spread operator can make code more concise and readable, but may require explicit declaration of variables for compatibility. **Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative approaches, consider: 1. Using `Array.prototype.push()` to concatenate arrays: `array1.push(...array2)` 2. Using `Array.prototype.concat.apply()` to concatenate arrays: `array1.concat(array2)` However, the spread operator (`[...array1, ...array2]`) is generally considered the most efficient and readable approach for concatenating arrays in modern JavaScript.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
concat 2 arrays: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator real
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator 12
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?