Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
_last vs regex
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
_last vs regex
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.21/lodash.min.js"></script>
Tests:
_last
const url = 'https://bo.test.danim.com/template/list/item/aeda0cf9-4f25-4d93-ba14-f8d5635a2817'; const id = _.last(url.split('/')); console.log(id);
regex
const url = 'https://bo.test.danim.com/template/list/item/aeda0cf9-4f25-4d93-ba14-f8d5635a2817'; const regex = /\/item\/([a-z0-9-]+)/; const match = regex.exec(url); const id = match[1]; console.log(id);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
_last
regex
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll provide an explanation of the benchmark, options compared, pros and cons of each approach, library usage, special JavaScript features or syntax, and alternatives. **Benchmark Overview** The provided JSON represents two test cases for measuring performance differences between using the `_.last()` method from Lodash and regular expressions (regex) in JavaScript. The test cases are: 1. `_last`: Uses the `_.last()` method to extract the last part of a URL. 2. `regex`: Uses regex to extract the last part of a URL. **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: A. Using the `_.last()` method from Lodash B. Using regular expressions (regex) **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** **A. Using the `_last()` method from Lodash** Pros: * Easier to read and write, as it's a concise way to extract the last part of a string. * Less error-prone, as it's a standardized function with well-defined behavior. Cons: * May be slower than regex for large strings due to the overhead of calling a JavaScript function. * Requires including Lodash in the project, which may add unnecessary dependencies. **B. Using regular expressions** Pros: * Highly optimized and efficient, making it suitable for large-scale performance-critical applications. * Can be more flexible than `_last()` with support for complex pattern matching. Cons: * More error-prone due to the complexity of regex patterns. * Less readable and maintainable, especially for developers without prior experience with regex. **Library Usage** Lodash is a popular JavaScript library that provides various utility functions, including `_.last()`. The inclusion of Lodash in the project adds dependencies and potential overhead. However, it can simplify code and make it more efficient for certain tasks. **Special JavaScript Features or Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these test cases, except for the use of Lodash's `_.last()` method. If you're not familiar with Lodash, it's a simple way to access the last element of an array (or string, in this case). **Alternatives** If you don't want to include Lodash or prefer regex over `_last()`, you can consider the following alternatives: * Use the `split()` method and index manipulation to extract the last part of the URL: `const url = 'https://bo.test.danim.com/template/list/item/aeda0cf9-4f25-4d93-ba14-f8d5635a2817'; const parts = url.split('/'); const id = parts[parts.length - 1];` * Use a regex that extracts the last part of the URL without relying on Lodash: `const url = 'https://bo.test.danim.com/template/list/item/aeda0cf9-4f25-4d93-ba14-f8d5635a2817'; const regex = /\/([a-z0-9-]+)/; const match = regex.exec(url); const id = match[1];` Keep in mind that these alternatives may be less efficient or more error-prone than using `_last()` with Lodash.
Related benchmarks:
isEmpty vs. vanilla
Array.find vs lodash _.includes vs compiled regex
Lodash trim VS native regexp
lodash _.includes vs regex
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?