Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Number constructor with short argument vs long argument
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Number(short string) vs Number(long string)
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var str0 = "abc"; var str1 = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz";
Tests:
Number(short string)
var a = Number(str0);
Number(long string)
var b = Number(str1);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Number(short string)
Number(long string)
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its test cases. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition provides information about the test case being measured. In this case, we have two test cases: 1. "Number constructor with short argument vs long argument" 2. "Name": null (description) 3. Script preparation code: `var str0 = "abc";` and `var str1 = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz";` The script preparation code defines two strings: a short string (`str0`) containing only 3 characters, and a long string (`str1`) containing 78 characters. **Test Cases** There are two individual test cases: 1. **Number(short string)** ```javascript var a = Number(str0); ``` This test case measures the performance of creating a number using the `Number()` constructor with a short string argument. 2. **Number(long string)** ```javascript var b = Number(str1); ``` This test case measures the performance of creating a number using the `Number()` constructor with a long string argument. **Library and Libraries Purpose** There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition, but we can infer that it might be related to JavaScript's built-in functions or libraries. In this case, `Number()` is a part of the JavaScript standard library. However, if the test cases were using a library like `moment.js` for date parsing, then `moment(str0)` and `moment(str1)` would be used instead. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** There isn't any special JavaScript feature or syntax mentioned in this benchmark definition. It only uses the standard `Number()` constructor and basic string operations. **Alternatives** If you wanted to test similar performance, you might consider using different approaches: * **Use a different number creation function**: Instead of using `Number()`, you could use a custom function that creates numbers from strings. * **Use a different string manipulation approach**: You could try using different methods for manipulating strings, such as concatenation or slicing. * **Test with other types of data**: Instead of testing with short and long strings, you could test with other types of data, such as numbers, booleans, or dates. Keep in mind that the specific alternatives will depend on the goals and requirements of your benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
String to int vs int to string 2
parseInt vs toString vs string literal vs + empty string vs String constructor
string to ~~ vs parseInt vs Number
String to number, parseInt, +, or * 1
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?