Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
new Array(0) x []
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
new Array(0) vs []
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
new Array(0)
const array1 = new Array(0)
[]
const array1 = []
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
new Array(0)
[]
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Measuring JavaScript performance is crucial for optimizing code and ensuring it runs efficiently across various environments. **Benchmark Definition Json** The provided JSON represents a benchmark definition, which outlines the characteristics of the test case. Let's break down what's being tested: * `Name`: The test case name, in this case, "new Array(0) x []". * `Description`: Not specified. * `Script Preparation Code` and `Html Preparation Code`: These are empty strings, indicating that no specific setup or HTML code is required before running the benchmark. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares two different approaches to creating an empty JavaScript array: 1. **Using `new Array(0)`**: Creates a new array with zero length. 2. **Using `[]` (array literal)**: Directly creates an empty array using square brackets. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** * **`new Array(0)`**: + Pros: Can be faster since it doesn't require parsing the array literal syntax. + Cons: May allocate more memory due to the initial size being non-zero. * **`[]` (array literal)**: + Pros: More concise and readable, with fewer allocations. + Cons: Might be slower due to the parser overhead. **Library and Special JS Features** There are no libraries or special JavaScript features mentioned in this benchmark. The test case only uses built-in JavaScript syntax. **Other Considerations** * Performance differences between `new Array(0)` and `[]` might be negligible unless running millions of iterations, as the impact of the initial allocation size is likely to be small. * The benchmark doesn't consider the use case or context in which these arrays are used. For example, if the array will grow dynamically during execution, the initial allocation size using `new Array(0)` might become more relevant. **Alternative Approaches** If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, here are a few examples: * Using `Array()`: This is another way to create an empty array using the `Array()` constructor. * Using `Object.create(null)`: This method creates a new object with no prototype and can be used as an alternative to arrays. Keep in mind that these alternatives might not provide significant performance benefits unless specifically designed for optimization purposes.
Related benchmarks:
empty an array in JavaScript?
empty an array in JavaScript?(Yorkie)
empty an array in JavaScript?(Yorkie)1
Clear array via array = [] vs array.length = 0
Array.push(x) vs array[n]=x
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?