Benchmark: performanceIntern

Script Preparation code:

var test = {
    "TmcBody_V01": {
        "suchenObjekte_Ok1_Ant_V01": {
            "suchenTreffer_Ok1_Ant_V01": {
                "TrefferZahl_V01": 0,
                "ObjektTyp_V01": "Notification_V02"
            }
        }
    }
}

Tests:

1
let a = test.TmcBody_V01.suchenObjekte_Ok1_Ant_V01.suchenTreffer_Ok1_Ant_V01 let b = a.TrefferZahl_V01; let c = a.ObjektTyp_V01;
2
let b = test.TmcBody_V01.suchenObjekte_Ok1_Ant_V01.suchenTreffer_Ok1_Ant_V01.TrefferZahl_V01; let c = test.TmcBody_V01.suchenObjekte_Ok1_Ant_V01.suchenTreffer_Ok1_Ant_V01.ObjektTyp_V01;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
1
2

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to help explain what's being tested.

**Benchmark Definition JSON**

The benchmark definition is a JSON object that contains metadata about the benchmark, including:

* `Name`: The name of the benchmark, which is "performanceIntern".
* `Description`: An empty string indicating no description for this benchmark.
* `Script Preparation Code`: A JavaScript code snippet that defines an object named `test` with nested properties. This code sets up the data structure used in the benchmark.
* `Html Preparation Code`: An empty string indicating no HTML preparation code is needed.

**Individual Test Cases**

There are two individual test cases defined:

1. **Test Case 1**
```javascript
let a = test.TmcBody_V01.suchenObjekte_Ok1_Ant_V01;
let b = a.TrefferZahl_V01;
let c = a.ObjektTyp_V01;
```
This test case performs three assignments in sequence:

* `a` is assigned the value of `test.TmcBody_V01.suchenObjekte_Ok1_Ant_V01`.
* The value of `TrefferZahl_V01` is extracted from the assigned object and stored in `b`.
* The value of `ObjektTyp_V01` is extracted from the same object and stored in `c`.

2. **Test Case 2**
```javascript
let b = test.TmcBody_V01.suchenObjekte_Ok1_Ant_V01.TrefferZahl_V01;
let c = test.TmcBody_V01.suchenObjekte_Ok1_Ant_V01.ObjektTyp_V01;
```
This test case performs two assignments in sequence:

* `b` is assigned the value of `test.TmcBody_V01.suchenObjekte_Ok1_Ant_V01.TrefferZahl_V01`.
* The value of `ObjektTyp_V01` is extracted from the same object and stored in `c`.

**What's being tested?**

These test cases seem to be testing the performance of accessing nested properties in an object. Specifically, they are measuring how fast it takes to:

1. Assign a reference to a nested object (`test.TmcBody_V01.suchenObjekte_Ok1_Ant_V01`) and then extract values from that object.
2. Access `TrefferZahl_V01` directly without assigning a reference to the nested object.

**Options compared**

The benchmark is comparing two approaches:

1. **Direct assignment**: Assigning a reference to the nested object (`test.TmcBody_V01.suchenObjekte_Ok1_Ant_V01`) and then extracting values from that object.
2. **Indirect access**: Accessing `TrefferZahl_V01` directly without assigning a reference to the nested object.

**Pros and Cons**

* **Direct assignment**:
	+ Pros: Can be faster if the nested object is already cached in memory, reducing the number of property lookups required.
	+ Cons: May incur additional overhead due to the initial assignment operation.
* **Indirect access**:
	+ Pros: Avoids potential caching issues with direct assignments and may reduce overhead due to fewer property lookups.
	+ Cons: May require more computations to extract values from the nested object.

**Library usage**

There is no explicit library usage mentioned in the benchmark definition or test cases. However, it's possible that the `test` object is created using a library like Lodash or jQuery, which provide utility functions for working with objects and arrays.

**Special JS feature or syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. The code uses standard ES5 syntax.

**Other alternatives**

Other alternatives to compare these two approaches could include:

* Using an intermediate variable to store the result of the nested object access, reducing the number of assignments.
* Using a caching mechanism to store the results of previous accesses to reduce overhead.
* Using a different data structure, such as an array or a Map, to store and retrieve values.

Related benchmarks:

performanceIntern (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: 1 vs 2

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

1

2

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):