Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Javascript slice vs substring vs replace vs replaceall
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Substring vs Slice vs Substr vs Replace vs ReplaceAll
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var text = '--bing';
Tests:
Substring
text = text.substring(2, text.length);
Slice
text = text.slice(2, text.length);
Substr
text = text.substr(2, text.length);
Replace
text = text.replace("--", "")
ReplaceAll
text = text.replaceAll("--", "")
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (5)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Substring
Slice
Substr
Replace
ReplaceAll
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 131 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
Substring
17266220.0 Ops/sec
Slice
17243420.0 Ops/sec
Substr
17341842.0 Ops/sec
Replace
16427916.0 Ops/sec
ReplaceAll
12698046.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the explanation of the JavaScript microbenchmarking test on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a JSON object that represents the script and HTML preparation code for each test case. In this case, the script preparation code is the same for all test cases: `var text = '--bing';`. This means that the input string is initialized with the value `--bing`. **Test Cases** There are four test cases: 1. **Substring**: The benchmark definition is `text = text.substring(2, text.length);`, which attempts to extract a substring starting from index 2 up to the end of the string. 2. **Slice**: The benchmark definition is `text = text.slice(2, text.length);`, which is similar to Substring but uses the `slice()` method instead. 3. **Substr**: The benchmark definition is `text = text.substr(2, text.length);`, which uses the `substr()` method to extract a substring starting from index 2 up to the end of the string. 4. **Replace**: The benchmark definition is `text = text.replace("--", "");`, which attempts to replace all occurrences of `--` with an empty string using the `replace()` method. 5. **ReplaceAll**: The benchmark definition is `text = text.replaceAll("--", "");`, which is similar to Replace but uses the `replaceAll()` method instead. **Options Compared** The options compared in this benchmark are: * Substring vs Slice: Both methods extract a substring from the input string, but Slice uses the `slice()` method, while Substring uses the `substring()` method. * Substr vs Replace/ReplaceAll: The Substr method extracts a substring starting from index 2 up to the end of the string, while Replace and ReplaceAll replace all occurrences of `--` with an empty string. **Pros and Cons** * **Substring vs Slice**: Slice is generally faster because it's implemented in native code (C++), while Substring is implemented in JavaScript (interpreted). However, the difference is usually negligible unless you're working with very large strings. * **Substr vs Replace/ReplaceAll**: The replace methods are likely to be slower than the substring/slice methods because they involve iterating over the entire string and making changes. Additionally, Substr extracts a fixed-length substring, while Replace/ReplaceAll can affect the performance of subsequent operations if not handled correctly. **Library** None of the test cases use any external libraries. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these benchmark definitions. **Other Considerations** * The input string `--bing` is short and simple, which might affect the results. In a real-world scenario, you'd want to test with longer strings. * The tests are run on Chrome 128, but it's possible that other browsers or versions of JavaScript would produce different results. **Alternatives** If you were to create similar benchmarks for other string manipulation methods in JavaScript, some alternatives could include: * Using larger input strings to see the impact on performance * Comparing the performance of different browsers or environments * Adding additional operations after the main benchmarked operation (e.g., concatenation, splitting) to simulate real-world use cases * Using a different set of string manipulation methods, such as regular expressions or internationalization functions.
Related benchmarks:
String.replace vs String.slice
Performance Test: substring vs substr vs slice vs replace last character
Replace text vs slice text
slice vs replaceAll
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?