Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
stringify vs foor loop 2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
stringify vs for loop
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var data = { "property0": 0.10513994713675823, "property1": 0.7055340325877781, "property2": 0.2054763561716113, "property3": 0.7118094220033806, "property4": 0.07592494124524052, "property5": 0.048505146632029206, "property6": 0.4054900970281281, "property7": 0.656193113115648, "property8": 0.467684235205867, "property9": 0.03230832145221618, "property10": 0.6510506688282658, "property11": 0.41869554191712277, "property12": 0.6965659259997359, "property13": 0.7261278170991217, "property14": 0.4709921353922335, "property15": 0.893801945089131, "property16": 0.9865404818253889, "property17": 0.22334374554495784, "property18": 0.8805778197948517, "property19": 0.09776768147937931, "property20": 0.12332176043263265, "property21": 0.4331484327405932, "property22": 0.7964819346504355, "property23": 0.84717887541781, "property24": 0.5050738539030639, "property25": 0.7798163434746646, "property26": 0.10154966966642487, "property27": 0.6508685912742631, "property28": 0.3927556108310766, "property29": 0.2879739458080284, "property30": 0.3356246318878735, "property31": 0.6170670397910019, "property32": 0.08161686219652875, "property33": 0.5495573308785582, "property34": 0.2971621548522314, "property35": 0.9515013932994203, "property36": 0.8552443261548672, "property37": 0.14090884358731293, "property38": 0.9599279218209185, "property39": 0.8136483439673645, "property40": 0.5075306464477873, "property41": 0.3614704670321318, "property42": 0.615960270535989, "property43": 0.41764887226906544, "property44": 0.5423066008670117, "property45": 0.3060913898005053, "property46": 0.018373340479033384, "property47": 0.16194670070660355, "property48": 0.6800550836365649, "property49": 0.5406218827905622, "property50": 0.9682395251597642, "property51": 0.5219849311257196, "property52": 0.16008011741631356, "property53": 0.5238565407943248, "property54": 0.4577743838609649, "property55": 0.07101915824378335, "property56": 0.4835564032338606, "property57": 0.6247488213915131, "property58": 0.024892197214200884, "property59": 0.9583794385703908, "property60": 0.43798321629740844, "property61": 0.2675634330239154, "property62": 0.9900831920507414, "property63": 0.04425426682699496, "property64": 0.13936613013933852, "property65": 0.2020533211772355, "property66": 0.6034022022143015, "property67": 0.7620101472459253, "property68": 0.1418331252144307, "property69": 0.6907320430320221, "property70": 0.1805934583097244, "property71": 0.7439916285784198, "property72": 0.7143320024831428, "property73": 0.1784207993272433, "property74": 0.5245605843290202, "property75": 0.43403288953769104, "property76": 0.5960403018456324, "property77": 0.2743643677427383, "property78": 0.451062011836999, "property79": 0.7185260666105591, "property80": 0.6519496899269468, "property81": 0.19807817211079115, "property82": 0.21596153224964976, "property83": 0.8696064778532975, "property84": 0.7789579847566901, "property85": 0.05628276971365431, "property86": 0.8978191822940904, "property87": 0.31978401280297586, "property88": 0.3722820185496609, "property89": 0.692832797674729, "property90": 0.4304162861064251, "property91": 0.6509695620463927, "property92": 0.20211374537017268, "property93": 0.8077065180365905, "property94": 0.8188077420445521, "property95": 0.10470390579819955, "property96": 0.7677581384108114, "property97": 0.0018772921708085644, "property98": 0.5569429743981777, "property99": 0.6593022524040761 }
Tests:
stringify
const result1 = JSON.stringify(data) const result2 = JSON.stringify(data)
for loop
for (const key in Object.keys(data)) { data[key] === data[key] }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
stringify
for loop
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Benchmark Explanation** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark test case on MeasureThat.net. The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two approaches: stringification using `JSON.stringify()` and a traditional for loop. **Stringification Approach** The first test case, "stringify", measures the time it takes to create a string representation of the input data using `JSON.stringify()`. The function `data` contains 50 properties with numeric values. **For Loop Approach** The second test case, "for loop", uses a traditional for loop to iterate over the properties of the input data and compare each value with itself. This approach is intended to demonstrate a more manual and iterative way of processing the data. **Benchmark Results** The latest benchmark results show that the Chrome 109 browser on a Windows Desktop platform executed the following: 1. "for loop" test case: approximately 35,082 executions per second. 2. "stringify" test case: approximately 78,495 executions per second. These results indicate that `JSON.stringify()` is significantly faster than the traditional for loop approach for this specific use case. **Performance Insights** The performance difference between these two approaches can be attributed to several factors: * **Efficiency**: `JSON.stringify()` is a built-in JavaScript function optimized for converting complex data structures into strings. It uses a sophisticated algorithm that minimizes the number of operations required to serialize the data. * **Iterative nature**: The traditional for loop approach requires manual iteration over the properties, which can lead to slower performance due to the overhead of the loop itself. * **JavaScript engine optimizations**: Modern JavaScript engines like V8 (used by Chrome) are highly optimized for various tasks, including stringification. They may also employ caching, just-in-time compilation, and other techniques to improve performance. In summary, this benchmark demonstrates that `JSON.stringify()` is generally faster than a traditional for loop approach for serializing data in JavaScript.
Related benchmarks:
loops_and_stuff
Number extraction - Regex vs split
Boolean vs double bang !!
Object.keys + map vs for...in + push
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?