Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
slice vs replaceAll vs direct change
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Slice vs ReplaceAll vs Direct Change
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Slice
const string = "--thing" string.slice(2);
ReplaceAll
const string = "--thing" string.replaceAll("--");
Direct Change
const string = "--thing" string[0] = ""; string[1] = "";
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Slice
ReplaceAll
Direct Change
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Overview of the Benchmark** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark test case, where users can compare the performance of different approaches to modify a string: `slice`, `replaceAll`, and direct indexing (`[0] = '""'`). **Options Compared** The three options compared in this benchmark are: 1. **Slice**: The `slice()` method returns a new string containing all characters from the original string, starting from the specified index (in this case, 2). This approach creates a new string object and copies the required characters. 2. **ReplaceAll**: The `replaceAll()` method returns a new string where all occurrences of the specified pattern are replaced with another value (in this case, an empty string). This approach also creates a new string object and replaces the specified pattern. 3. **Direct Change**: Directly modifying the original string by assigning a new value to the desired index (`[0] = '""'`). This approach modifies the original string in place. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **Slice**: * Pros: Creates a new string object, which can be more efficient for large strings. * Cons: Creates an unnecessary copy of the string, which can lead to increased memory allocation and deallocation overhead. 2. **ReplaceAll**: * Pros: Similar to `slice()`, creates a new string object, but with a different pattern to match. * Cons: Also creates an unnecessary copy of the string, similar to `slice()`. 3. **Direct Change**: * Pros: Modifies the original string in place, which can be more efficient since it avoids creating a new string object. * Cons: May lead to unexpected behavior if not careful, as modifying the string directly can have unintended side effects. **Library Used** None, this benchmark only uses built-in JavaScript features and functions. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** No special JavaScript feature or syntax is used in this benchmark. It only relies on standard JavaScript methods and operators. **Other Alternatives** If you need to modify a string, other alternatives to consider: * Using a library like `lodash` or `underscore`, which provide optimized string manipulation functions. * Using a regex-based approach with the `replace()` method. * Using a more efficient string replacement algorithm, such as using a `Buffer` object for large strings. Keep in mind that the choice of alternative depends on the specific use case and performance requirements.
Related benchmarks:
String.replace vs String.slice
Replace text vs slice text
splice vs replace
slice vs replace (same search)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?