Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
str.match vs str.Split (regex)
(version: 0)
Test String.match with regex against String.split with string. We are splitting a string at the spaces.
Comparing performance of:
String.split vs Regex.match
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
string = "This https://mantine.dev/core/text/ also has a #hashtag"; urlPattern = /(\b(https?):\/\/[-A-Z0-9+&@#\/%?=~_|!:,.;]*[-A-Z0-9+&@#\/%=~_|])/gi;
Tests:
String.split
string.split(urlPattern)
Regex.match
string.match(urlPattern)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
String.split
Regex.match
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.1:latest
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the details of this benchmark test. **What is being tested?** This benchmark tests two different approaches to splitting a string at spaces: 1. Using the `split()` method on a string with a regular expression (regex) pattern (`urlPattern`). 2. Using the `match()` method on a string with the same regex pattern. **What are the pros and cons of each approach?** 1. **String.split()** * Pros: + Can split a string into an array of substrings using any separator (not just spaces). + Is generally faster than `match()` for simple splitting use cases. * Cons: + May not be as efficient for complex regex patterns or large input strings. 2. **String.match()** * Pros: + Allows for more complex pattern matching and extraction of groups (not just splitting). + Can be used for tasks beyond simple string splitting. * Cons: + Tends to be slower than `split()` for simple splitting use cases. + Requires more overhead due to the regex engine's complexity. **What is the library involved?** None. This benchmark uses only built-in JavaScript features and doesn't rely on any external libraries. **Special JS feature or syntax used?** None. The code uses standard JavaScript string methods (`split()` and `match()`) and regex patterns, which are well-known and widely used in JavaScript development. **Alternatives** Other alternatives to consider for string splitting include: 1. Using a dedicated string splitting library like [str-regex](https://www.npmjs.com/package/str-regex) or [split-string](https://www.npmjs.com/package/split-string). 2. Employing more advanced text processing techniques, such as using a parsing library (e.g., [parse-number](https://www.npmjs.com/package/parse-number)) for specific use cases. 3. Using JavaScript's built-in `split()` method with custom separators or patterns. Overall, this benchmark provides a straightforward comparison of two standard JavaScript methods for string splitting, allowing developers to choose the most suitable approach for their specific use case.
Related benchmarks:
str.match vs str.Split first result
str.match vs str.Split(regex)
str.match vs str.Split3322
str.match vs str.Split in regex
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?