Benchmark: typescript class performance benchmark

Tests:

object and function
function itemsToString(params) { return { ...params, param0: params.param0.toString(), param1: params.param1.toString(), param2: params.param2.toString(), param3: params.param3.toString(), param4: params.param4.toString(), param5: params.param5.toString(), param6: params.param6.toString(), param7: params.param7.toString(), param8: params.param8.toString(), param9: params.param9.toString(), param10: params.param10.toString(), param11: params.param11.toString(), }; } for (let i = 1; i < 2000; i++) { let myParam = { param0: 10, param1: 11, param2: 12, param3: 13, param4: 14, param5: 15, param6: 16, param7: 17, param8: 18, param9: 19, param10: 20, param11: 21, }; itemsToString(myParam); }
class and class method
class MyTypeClass { params; constructor(params) { this.params = params; } itemsToString() { return { ...this.params, param0: this.params.param0.toString(), param1: this.params.param1.toString(), param2: this.params.param2.toString(), param3: this.params.param3.toString(), param4: this.params.param4.toString(), param5: this.params.param5.toString(), param6: this.params.param6.toString(), param7: this.params.param7.toString(), param8: this.params.param8.toString(), param9: this.params.param9.toString(), param10: this.params.param10.toString(), param11: this.params.param11.toString(), }; } } for (let i = 1; i < 2000; i++) { new MyTypeClass({ param0: 10, param1: 11, param2: 12, param3: 13, param4: 14, param5: 15, param6: 16, param7: 17, param8: 18, param9: 19, param10: 20, param11: 21, }).itemsToString(); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
object and function
class and class method

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/136.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 136 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
object and function	4524.3 Ops/sec
class and class method	2295.8 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of MeasureThat.net!

**Benchmark Definition**

The provided JSON represents a benchmark definition for creating an object, applying a function to it, and comparing two test cases: "object and function" and "class and class method." The script preparation code is not provided, which means that the user needs to write their own code to create the benchmarks.

**Options Compared**

In this benchmark, two options are compared:

1. **Function-based approach**: The first test case uses a simple function `itemsToString` that takes an object as input and returns a new object with some of its properties converted to strings.
2. **Class-based approach**: The second test case defines a class `MyTypeClass` that has a constructor and an `itemsToString` method, which is similar to the function-based approach.

**Pros and Cons**

Here are some pros and cons of each approach:

**Function-Based Approach**

Pros:

* Easier to understand and implement
* Less code overhead
* Can be more flexible and reusable

Cons:

* May not provide the same level of encapsulation as a class
* Limited access control (e.g., no private members)

**Class-Based Approach**

Pros:

* Provides a higher level of encapsulation and abstraction
* Allows for better access control (e.g., private members)
* Can be more object-oriented

Cons:

* More code overhead
* May be harder to understand and implement, especially for beginners

**Other Considerations**

When choosing between these two approaches, consider the specific requirements of your project. If you need a simple, lightweight solution with minimal code overhead, the function-based approach might be a good choice. However, if you require more structure, encapsulation, and object-oriented programming features, the class-based approach is likely a better fit.

**Library Usage**

There is no explicit library usage mentioned in the benchmark definition or individual test cases.

**Special JS Features or Syntax**

No special JavaScript features or syntax are used in these benchmarks. However, it's worth noting that MeasureThat.net supports various JavaScript versions and browsers, so if you're using a newer feature or syntax not supported by all browsers, you might need to adjust your code accordingly.

**Other Alternatives**

If you're looking for alternative benchmarking tools or approaches, consider the following options:

1. **Benchmark.js**: A popular open-source benchmarking library for Node.js and browser environments.
2. **Benchmarking frameworks**: Frameworks like Benchmarking in JavaScript or Speedtest provide a structured approach to benchmarking web applications.
3. **Manual benchmarking**: You can also write your own manual benchmarking scripts using tools like `time` or `perf` commands, depending on the platform.

I hope this explanation helps!

Related benchmarks:

typescript class performance benchmark (version: 0)

Create Object/Instance and apply Function/Method on it

Comparing performance of: object and function vs class and class method

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

object and function

class and class method

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):