Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
If vs Object Literal
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
If vs Object Literal
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var str = 'abc'; str = str.charAt(Math.floor(Math.random() * 3));
Tests:
If
if (str === 'a') { console.log('A'); } else if (str === 'b') { console.log('B'); } else { console.log('C'); }
Object Literal
var objLiteral = { a: function() { console.log('A'); }, b: function() { console.log('B'); }, c: function() { console.log('C'); } } objLiteral[str]();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
If
Object Literal
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
gemma2:9b
, generated one year ago):
This benchmark compares two ways of checking if a variable `str` holds the values 'a', 'b', or 'c': **1. If Statement:** This approach uses a traditional `if-else if-else` statement chain to compare `str` against each possible value and log the corresponding letter. **2. Object Literal with Functions:** This method defines an object where keys are the possible values ('a', 'b', 'c'), and each key is associated with a function that logs the corresponding letter. The chosen function is then executed based on the value of `str`. **Pros and Cons:** * **If Statement:** * **Pros:** Generally considered more readable and intuitive for simple conditional logic. * **Cons:** Can become verbose for many conditions, potentially impacting readability. * **Object Literal with Functions:** * **Pros:** Can be concise for a large number of conditions. Allows grouping related behavior together in the object. * **Cons:** Might feel less intuitive than `if-else` statements for basic comparisons. **Other Considerations:** * In this specific case, both methods are relatively performant due to the simplicity of the task. Benchmark results show a negligible difference between the two approaches. **Alternatives:** Besides the two presented options, JavaScript offers other ways to achieve similar results: * **Switch Statement:** Can be more efficient than `if-else` chains for multiple conditions, especially when dealing with constant values like in this benchmark. * **Maps:** For dynamic condition mapping where keys are not fixed constants, Maps offer a flexible and performant alternative to object literals. Let me know if you have any further questions!
Related benchmarks:
Number vs + vs parseFloat
Math.floor vs Math.trunc
Number vs + vs parseFloat 23
Math.max/min vs if vs ternary operatorsd
orderBy vs array.prototype.sort vs vanila orderBy vs QuickSort
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?