Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
test a b
(version: 0)
ㅋㅋ
Comparing performance of:
a vs b
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
a
"media " + "@dark".slice(1, 4)
b
"media " + "@dark".substring(1, 5)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
a
b
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark JSON data. **Benchmark Definition** The "Benchmark Definition" is a JavaScript expression that represents what's being tested. In this case, there are two test cases: 1. `"media " + "dark".slice(1, 4)` 2. `"media " + "dark".substring(1, 5)` Both expressions are identical, but they use different methods to extract a substring from the string `"dark"`. **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: * `slice()`: A method that extracts a section of a string, starting at the specified start index and ending at the specified end index. * `substring()`: A method that returns a new string that includes the characters in the string from the start index up to but not including the end index. **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief overview of each option: * `slice()`: + Pros: More flexible than `substring()` since it can take arbitrary start and end indices, allowing for more complex substring extractions. + Cons: Can be slower than `substring()` due to the overhead of creating a new array. * `substring()`: + Pros: Faster and more memory-efficient than `slice()`, especially for small substrings. + Cons: Less flexible since it only allows starting at an index that is exactly one less than the end index. **Library** There doesn't appear to be any external libraries being used in these test cases. The benchmarking framework seems to rely on built-in JavaScript methods. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The `@dark` part in the benchmark definitions appears to be a custom annotation or tag, but it's not a standard JavaScript feature or syntax. It might be specific to the testing framework or environment being used. **Alternatives** If you wanted to test similar substring extraction operations without using these two methods, you could use other options like: * `indexOf()` and concatenation * Regular expressions (` RegExp.prototype.exec()` ) * The `RegExp.prototype.split()` method (if you're okay with splitting the string into substrings) Keep in mind that each alternative would have its own pros and cons compared to `slice()` and `substring()`.
Related benchmarks:
isEqual vs length 3
Lodash deep isEqual test
compare boolean values
compare boolean values v0.1
Lodash isEqual test (slightly bigger test data)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?