Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
querySelector vs getElementsByClassName Corrected
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
querySelector vs getElementsByClassName
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div class="test"></div>
Tests:
querySelector
document.querySelector(".test")
getElementsByClassName
document.getElementsByClassName("test")
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
querySelector
getElementsByClassName
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and its test cases. **Benchmark Purpose** MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The benchmark in question is designed to compare the performance of two DOM query methods: `querySelector` and `getElementsByClassName`. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares the execution speed of these two methods on a single HTML element: 1. `document.querySelector(".test")` 2. `document.getElementsByClassName("test")` **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** **querySelector** Pros: * More modern and efficient approach * Returns an array with one element (the matched element), which can be more convenient in some cases * Less browser-specific (works well across different browsers) Cons: * Older method, introduced in HTML5 * Some older browsers may not support it **getElementsByClassName** Pros: * More widely supported across older browsers * Allows for easier selection of multiple elements by class name Cons: * Returns an array with all matching elements, which can be less convenient to work with * Less efficient than `querySelector` in many cases **Library and Purpose** In this benchmark, no libraries are used. **Special JS Features/Syntax** None mentioned. **Other Considerations** When choosing between `querySelector` and `getElementsByClassName`, consider the following: * If you need to select a single element by class name, `querySelector` is likely faster and more efficient. * If you need to select multiple elements by class name or need compatibility with older browsers, `getElementsByClassName` might be a better choice. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for selecting DOM elements include: 1. `document.createElement("DIV")` + `appendChild` (not as efficient as the two methods) 2. `document.createStyleSheet()` and then use CSS selectors (less efficient than the two methods) Keep in mind that modern browsers have optimized their DOM query APIs, making them generally fast and efficient. In this benchmark, MeasureThat.net likely used the latest browser version for testing, which is Firefox 108 in this case.
Related benchmarks:
querySelector() vs getElementsByClassName()[0]
getElementsByClassName()[0] vs querySelectorAll
querySelector vs getElementsByClassName fixed
querySelector vs getElementsByClassName fixed?
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?