Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Parent.Parent vs ParentUntil
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Parent.Parent vs ParentsUntil
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div class="top"> <ul> <li class="current">1</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> </ul> <div class="child"> <span>2</span> </div> </div> <script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.6.3.slim.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
item = $('.current');
Tests:
Parent.Parent
console.log(item.parent().parent().find(".child > span"));
ParentsUntil
console.log(item.parentsUntil('.top').find(".child > span"));
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Parent.Parent
ParentsUntil
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares two approaches to navigating through an HTML document: `Parent.Parent` and `ParentsUntil`. The test targets JavaScript performance, specifically the speed of traversing DOM elements using these two methods. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code is: ```javascript item = $('.current'); ``` This line selects an HTML element with the class `current` using jQuery. This element will serve as a reference point for the benchmark. **Html Preparation Code** The HTML preparation code is: ```html <div class="top"> <ul> <li class="current">1</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> </ul> <div class="child"> <span>2</span> </div> </div> <script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.6.3.slim.min.js"></script> ``` This HTML code defines a container with two nested elements: an unordered list (`<ul>`) and a `div` element (`<div class="child">`). The `current` element is contained within the `<ul>`. **Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **Parent.Parent**: This test navigates from the current element (`item`) to its parent element using `.parent()` twice, and then selects a child element within that grandparent. ```javascript console.log(item.parent().parent().find(".child > span")); ``` 2. **ParentsUntil**: This test uses jQuery's `parentsUntil` method to navigate from the current element to the closest ancestor that matches a specified selector (`".top"`). It then selects a child element within that ancestor. **Library: jQuery** The benchmark uses jQuery, which is a popular JavaScript library for DOM manipulation and event handling. In this case, jQuery provides the `$.fn.parent()`, `$.fn.parentsUntil()`, and `$()` (the selector function) methods used in the test cases. **Special JS Feature/ Syntax:** There isn't any specific JavaScript feature or syntax being tested here. The benchmark focuses on comparing two different DOM traversal approaches using standard JavaScript and jQuery. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach:** 1. **Parent.Parent**: * Pros: + Simple and straightforward approach. + Uses native JavaScript methods, which may be preferred for smaller projects or performance-critical code. * Cons: + May require more iterations to reach the desired ancestor element due to the double traversal. 2. **ParentsUntil**: * Pros: + Faster navigation through the DOM, especially when traversing large ancestors. + Uses jQuery's optimized implementation for `parentsUntil`. * Cons: + Requires an additional library (jQuery) and may introduce overhead. **Other Alternatives:** For DOM traversal, alternative approaches include: 1. **getElementsByClassName**: This method returns a NodeList containing the first element(s) with the specified class name. 2. **querySelector**/**querySelectorAll**: These methods return a single element or a NodeList containing the first element(s) matching the specified CSS selector. In general, when choosing between these alternatives, consider factors such as performance, compatibility, and ease of use for your specific use case.
Related benchmarks:
jQuery 3.6 parent() vs closest() speed performance comparison
jQuery parents() vs closest() speed performance comparison
jQuery parents() vs closest()
Find vs traversing
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?