Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Spread vs direct Object assignment V3
(version: 2)
Comparing performance of:
direct vs spread
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
window.direct = (targets, params = {}) => { params.targets = targets; return params; } window.spread = (targets, params = {}) => { return {targets, ...params}; }
Tests:
direct
direct('target', { p1: 1, p2: 2, p3: 3, p4: 4, p5: 5, p6: 6, p7: 7, p8: 8, p9: 9, p10: 10, p11: 11, p12: 12, p13: 13, p14: 14, p15: 15, p16: 16, })
spread
spread('target', { p1: 1, p2: 2, p3: 3, p4: 4, p5: 5, p6: 6, p7: 7, p8: 8, p9: 9, p10: 10, p11: 11, p12: 12, p13: 13, p14: 14, p15: 15, p16: 16, })
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
direct
spread
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**What is tested in the provided JSON?** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark test case on MeasureThat.net. The benchmark compares two approaches for assigning properties to an object: using the `direct` method and using the spread operator (`...`). **Options compared:** 1. **Direct Object Assignment**: This approach uses the `window.direct` function, which takes an object with target properties as an argument. It creates a new object with the same target properties. 2. **Spread Operator**: This approach uses the spread operator (`...`) to create a new object with the target properties. **Pros and Cons of each approach:** * **Direct Object Assignment**: + Pros: - Can be more efficient for large numbers of properties, as it avoids creating an intermediate object. - Can be more readable for simple cases. + Cons: - Requires explicit property names, which can lead to errors if the wrong property name is used. - May have performance overhead due to function call and property lookup. * **Spread Operator**: + Pros: - More concise and readable than direct assignment. - Easier to avoid errors due to implicit property creation. + Cons: - Can lead to performance issues if the target object is large or has many properties, as it creates an intermediate object. **Library:** There is no explicit library used in this benchmark. However, `window.direct` and the spread operator are part of the JavaScript standard library. **Special JS feature or syntax:** The benchmark uses the spread operator (`...`) which is a relatively modern feature introduced in ECMAScript 2018 (ES2018). This feature allows for concise object creation and assignment using the syntax `objectName = { key1: value1, key2: value2 };` instead of `objectName.key1 = value1; objectName.key2 = value2;`. **Other alternatives:** There are alternative approaches to these two methods: * Instead of direct assignment or spread operator, you can use `Object.assign()` method to assign properties to an object. This approach is more explicit and avoids potential issues with property naming. * For large datasets, you can consider using `Array.from()` and `reduce()` methods to create objects in a more memory-efficient manner. **Benchmark preparation code:** The provided JSON includes the script preparation code for the benchmark: ```javascript window.direct = (targets, params = {}) => { params.targets = targets; return params; } window.spread = (targets, params = {}) => { return { targets, ...params }; } ``` This code defines two functions: `direct` and `spread`, which are used to assign properties to objects using the respective methods. **Individual test cases:** The provided JSON includes two individual test cases: 1. "direct" - Tests the direct object assignment method. 2. "spread" - Tests the spread operator method. Each test case has a unique name, and their benchmarking results are stored in separate objects. The latest benchmark result shows that the `direct` approach performed better than the `spread` approach for this specific use case.
Related benchmarks:
Spread vs Object.assign (modify ) vs Object.assign (new)
Object.assign vs spread operatora
object spread vs Object.assign
JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign performance - Kien Nguyen
Object.assign() vs spread operator (New object)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?