Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
asddda
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
a1 vs a2
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
const lp = { "info": { "name": "atest", "groupId": "A", "lvl": 10, "pmckd": 0.5, "kd": 8, "k": 100, "hs": 50, "faction": "us" }, "x": 0.5, "y": 0.5, "z": 0.5, "hp": 100 } function formatInfoText(infotext, player, noIcons) { const info = player.info const dx = player.x - lp.x const dy = player.y - lp.y const dz = player.z - lp.z return infotext.replaceAll(/\$[a-z]+/g, function(match) { if (match === "$name") return info.name if (match === "$group") return info.groupId if (match === "$lvl") return info.lvl if (match === "$pmckd") return info.pmckd if (match === "$kd") return info.kd if (match === "$hs") return (info.hs / info.k * 100).toFixed(0) + "%" if (match === "$faction") return info.faction if (match === "$badge") return info.badge ? `<img src="${info.badge}" class="inlinepic">` : "" if (match === "$dist") return Math.round(Math.sqrt(dx * dx + dy * dy + dz * dz)) if (match === "$height") return Math.round(dz) if (match === "$hp") return player.hp return "undefined" }) } function formatInfoText2(infotext, player, noIcons) { const info = player.info const dx = player.x - lp.x const dy = player.y - lp.y const dz = player.z - lp.z return infotext .replace("$name", info.name) .replace("$group", info.groupId) .replace("$lvl", info.lvl) .replace("$pmckd", info.pmckd) .replace("$kd", info.kd) .replace("$hs", (info.hs / info.k * 100).toFixed(0) + "%") .replace("$faction", info.faction) .replace("$badge", info.badge ? `<img src="${info.badge}" class="inlinepic">` : "") .replace("$dist", Math.round(Math.sqrt(dx * dx + dy * dy + dz * dz))) .replace("$height", Math.round(dz)) .replace("$hp", player.hp) }
Tests:
a1
const p = { "info": { "name": "atest", "groupId": "A", "lvl": 10, "pmckd": 0.5, "kd": 8, "k": 100, "hs": 50, "faction": "us" }, "x": 0.5, "y": 0.5, "z": 0.5, "hp": 100 } formatInfoText("$kd $name $hs", p, false)
a2
const p = { "info": { "name": "atest", "groupId": "A", "lvl": 10, "pmckd": 0.5, "kd": 8, "k": 100, "hs": 50, "faction": "us" }, "x": 0.5, "y": 0.5, "z": 0.5, "hp": 100 } formatInfoText2("$kd $name $hs", p, false)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
a1
a2
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Measuring performance in JavaScript benchmarks like MeasuringThat.net can be complex, as it involves various factors such as browser and device specifics, system resources, and the intricacies of JavaScript execution. **Benchmark Definition JSON Analysis** The benchmark definition provided contains two script preparation codes with slight variations. Both scripts define a `p` object with similar properties (`info`, `x`, `y`, `z`, `hp`) and use the `formatInfoText` function to generate an HTML string. The main difference lies in the `formatInfoText2` function, which uses regular expression replacements instead of string concatenation. **Options Compared** The two script preparation codes compare different approaches: 1. **String Concatenation (`formatInfoText`)** * Pros: Easy to read and understand, no overhead for creating intermediate strings. * Cons: Can lead to slower performance due to the creation of multiple intermediate strings during string concatenation. 2. **Regular Expression Replacement (`formatInfoText2`)** * Pros: Generally faster than string concatenation, as it avoids creating intermediate strings. * Cons: Requires more complex logic and can be harder to read and understand for some developers. **Other Considerations** - The benchmark definition also includes an empty `Html Preparation Code` field, which is likely used by the MeasuringThat.net framework to prepare the HTML environment for the test. - Both script preparation codes use a `lp` object with predefined values, which suggests that this object might be reused across multiple tests or configurations. **Library and Special JS Feature** The benchmark definition uses the `formatInfoText` function, which is not a built-in JavaScript library. This function appears to be a custom implementation for formatting information text based on a given template string (`$kd $name $hs`) and an object with predefined values (`p`). The use of this custom function might indicate that the benchmark definition is specific to the test framework or platform being used. **Alternatives** For alternative approaches, developers could consider: - Using a templating engine like Handlebars.js or Mustache to generate the HTML string. - Implementing a more efficient string concatenation strategy using techniques like string pooling or character buffering. - Optimizing the `formatInfoText` function for better performance by reducing the number of DOM manipulations or using native JavaScript methods. Keep in mind that these alternatives should be considered on a case-by-case basis, taking into account factors such as maintainability, readability, and compatibility with different browsers and platforms.
Related benchmarks:
dsteem vs steem-js round 2
dsteem vs steem-js round 2
dsteem vs steem-js round 2
Map, filter, concat, intersection comparison
display_quantity_test
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?