Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator latest
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.concat
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
spread operator
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] var other = [ 1, 2, ...params ]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.concat
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and the pros and cons of each approach. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares two ways to concatenate arrays in JavaScript: 1. **Array.prototype.concat()**: The traditional method of concatenating arrays using the `concat()` method. 2. **Spread Operator (latest)**: The new ES6 spread operator (`...`) that allows for more concise and expressive array manipulation. **Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **`Array.prototype.concat`** * Test case: `var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);` * This test case checks how the `concat()` method performs on a small array of primitive values. 2. **`spread operator`** * Test case: `var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]\nvar other = [ 1, 2, ...params ];` * This test case checks how the spread operator (`...`) performs when used to concatenate an array with another array. **Pros and Cons** **`Array.prototype.concat()`** Pros: * Well-established and widely supported method * Easy to understand and implement Cons: * Can be slower than the spread operator for large arrays * Can create a new object each time, which can lead to memory allocation issues in some cases **Spread Operator (latest)**** Pros: * More concise and expressive syntax * Can be faster than `concat()` for large arrays * Does not create a new array, instead creates a new iterable Cons: * Less widely supported by older browsers or versions of JavaScript * May lead to confusion due to its non-obvious behavior when used with certain data types (e.g., objects) **Library Usage** There is no library mentioned in the provided benchmark. However, it's worth noting that some JavaScript engines may use various internal optimizations or libraries to perform array concatenation. In this case, the benchmark likely assumes that the test cases are designed to isolate these differences. **Special JS Features or Syntax** The spread operator (`...`) was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) and is a relatively new feature. It allows for more concise and expressive way of creating arrays by spreading existing arrays or values into a new array. **Other Alternatives** In addition to `Array.prototype.concat()` and the spread operator, there are other ways to concatenate arrays in JavaScript, such as: * Using `push()`: `arr.push(...newArr)` * Using `set()`: `new Set([...arr, ...newArr])` * Using `reduce()`: `arr.reduce((acc, curr) => [...acc, curr], [])` These alternatives may have different performance characteristics or use cases, and the benchmark likely aims to compare their performance in specific scenarios.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
concat 2 arrays: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator (fix)
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on large array
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on small array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?