Benchmark: Lodash DifferenceWith vs Native (foo)

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.4/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var oldArr = [
  {
    "id": 52
  },
  {
    "id": 76
  },
  {
    "id": 13
  },
  {
    "id": 96
  },
  {
    "id": 27
  },
  {
    "id": 8
  },
  {
    "id": 23
  },
  {
    "id": 63
  },
  {
    "id": 25
  }
]

var newArr = [
{
    "id": 52
  },
  {
    "id": 76
  },
  {
    "id": 13
  },
  {
    "id": 96
  },
  {
    "id": 27
  },
  {
    "id": 8
  },
  {
    "id": 23
  },
  {
    "id": 63
  },
  {
    "id": 25
  },
  {
    "id": 1
  },
]

Tests:

Native
newArr.reduce((ids, {id}) => { return ids.concat( !oldArr.some(oldItem => oldItem.id === id) ? id : [] ); }, [])
Lodash.js filter
_.differenceWith(newArr, oldArr, (e1,e2) => e1.id === e2.id);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Native
Lodash.js filter

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 131 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Native	4161874.8 Ops/sec
Lodash.js filter	5856407.5 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Lodash DifferenceWith vs Native (foo) (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Native vs Lodash.js filter

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Native

Lodash.js filter

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A