Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator simple
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.concat
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
spread operator
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] var other = [ 1, 2, ...params ]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.concat
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain the benchmark and provide insights on the test cases. **Benchmark Overview** The MeasureThat.net website provides a platform for creating and running JavaScript microbenchmarks. The benchmark in question compares two approaches to merge arrays: the traditional `Array.prototype.concat()` method and the new ES6 spread operator (`...`). **Options Compared** Two options are compared: 1. **Traditional `Array.prototype.concat()`**: This is an older method for merging arrays, which was widely used before the introduction of the spread operator. 2. **ES6 Spread Operator (`...`)**: Introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6), this operator allows for more concise and expressive way to merge arrays. **Pros and Cons** * **Traditional `Array.prototype.concat()`**: Pros: + Wide support across older browsers and Node.js versions. + Clear and simple syntax. * Cons: + Less concise than the spread operator. + Can lead to performance issues for large datasets due to the creation of a new array object. * **ES6 Spread Operator (`...`)**: Pros: + More concise and readable syntax. + Creates a shallow copy of the original array, avoiding unnecessary re-allocations. + Better performance than `concat()` for large datasets. However, the spread operator also has some cons: * Less supported across older browsers and Node.js versions (although it's widely adopted). * May lead to issues with array references and prototype chain inheritance. **Library and Special JS Features** In this benchmark, there is no explicit library mentioned. However, the test cases assume that the `Array` object and its methods are available in the testing environment. There are no special JavaScript features mentioned in the benchmark definition or individual test cases. **Other Considerations** When choosing between `concat()` and the spread operator, consider the following factors: * Code readability: If you prefer a more concise syntax, use the spread operator. * Performance: For large datasets, use the spread operator for better performance. * Browser compatibility: If you need to support older browsers or versions, use `concat()`. * Array references and prototype chain inheritance: Be cautious when using the spread operator, as it may lead to issues with these aspects. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for merging arrays include: * Using `Array.prototype.push.apply()` (less common and less efficient than `concat()`). * Creating a new array object using the `Array` constructor and pushing elements from both arrays (more verbose but more control). However, in most cases, `concat()` and the spread operator are sufficient and widely supported.
Related benchmarks:
concat 2 arrays: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator (fix)
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator real
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on large array
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on small array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?