Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
set.has vs. array.includes vs array.find vs map.has
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
Array.includes vs Set.has vs Array.find vs Map.has
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]; var b = new Set(a) var c = new Map(); a.forEach(x => c.set(x, x)) // just for test.
Tests:
Array.includes
return a.includes(9)
Set.has
return b.has(9)
Array.find
return a.find(x => x === 9)
Map.has
return c.has(9)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.includes
Set.has
Array.find
Map.has
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
9 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/138.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 138 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=614820" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Test name
Executions per second
Array.includes
111884616.0 Ops/sec
Set.has
223068736.0 Ops/sec
Array.find
114540600.0 Ops/sec
Map.has
219886880.0 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
Array.includes vs Set.has vas Map.has
set vs array find if exists
set.has vs. array.includes vs array.find vs map.has (20 elements)
Array.includes vs Set.has vas Map retrive
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?