Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Nullish coalescing vs if-chains
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Nullish coalescing vs If chains
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Nullish coalescing
let a = null return a ?? "b";
If chains
let v = null if(v !== null) { return a; } return "b";
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Nullish coalescing
If chains
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
gemma2:9b
, generated one year ago):
This benchmark on MeasureThat.net compares two ways of handling potential null values in JavaScript: **1. Nullish Coalescing Operator (`??`)**: * This approach uses the `??` operator, which returns the left operand if it's not null or undefined, otherwise it returns the right operand. In this case: `let a = null; return a ?? "b";`. **2. If-Chain**: * This approach uses an `if` statement to check if the variable (`v`) is not null. If it's not, it returns a value (`a`). Otherwise, it returns `"b"`. ```javascript let v = null; if(v !== null) { return a; } return "b"; ``` **Pros and Cons:** * **Nullish Coalescing (`??`)**: * **Pros:** More concise and readable, especially when dealing with multiple null checks. * **Cons:** Can be less clear if the logic is complex or involves other conditions besides just checking for null/undefined. * **If-Chain**: * **Pros:** More explicit about the conditional check, potentially clearer for complex logic involving multiple conditions. * **Cons:** Can become verbose and harder to read when dealing with many consecutive checks. **Other Considerations:** * **Performance:** Both approaches are generally efficient in modern JavaScript engines. However, very minor performance differences might exist depending on the specific implementation details. The benchmark results provided show that the nullish coalescing operator is slightly faster. * **Readability and Maintainability:** Nullish coalescing is often preferred for its conciseness and readability. **Alternatives:** * **Ternary Operator (`condition ? value1 : value2`)**: This can be used as a shorter alternative to the if-chain, but it might not always be as readable for complex conditions: ```javascript return v !== null ? a : "b"; ``` Let me know if you have any more questions!
Related benchmarks:
Nullish coalescing vs logical OR operators
Nullish coalescing V.S. Logic or operator (native)
Testing for false vs undefined vs == null vs hasOwnProperty vs hasOwn for undefined member
Testing for false vs undefined vs == null vs prototype.hasOwnProperty vs hasOwn for undefined member
lodash isNil vs native isNil with if
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?