Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Test slice vs array.length accessing last element
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Using slice vs Using length
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var arr = Array.from(Array(100).keys());
Tests:
Using slice
var last = arr.slice(-1)[0]
Using length
var last = arr[arr.length-1]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Using slice
Using length
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
gemma2:9b
, generated one year ago):
This benchmark tests two different ways to access the last element of an array in JavaScript: **Method 1: Using `slice()`** * **Benchmark Definition:** `var last = arr.slice(-1)[0]` - `arr.slice(-1)` creates a new subarray containing only the last element of the original array `arr`. - `[0]` accesses the first (and only) element of this subarray, effectively giving you the last element of the original array. **Method 2: Using `length` property** * **Benchmark Definition:** `var last = arr[arr.length - 1]` - `arr.length` returns the number of elements in the array. - `arr.length - 1` gives you the index of the last element (remember, arrays are zero-indexed). - `arr[arr.length - 1]` accesses the element at that index, which is the last element of the array. **Pros and Cons:** * **`slice()`:** - **Pros:** More flexible; can extract a range of elements (not just the last one). Can be used to create a shallow copy of a portion of an array. - **Cons:** Creates a new array, which might have a slight performance overhead compared to directly accessing an element. * **`length` Property:** - **Pros:** Generally considered slightly faster than `slice()` for simply accessing the last element. More concise syntax. - **Cons:** Less flexible; can't extract ranges of elements like `slice()`. **Other Considerations:** The benchmark result shows that `slice()` is slightly faster in this specific case (likely due to optimizations in modern JavaScript engines). However, the difference might not be significant in real-world applications. The choice between the two methods often comes down to personal preference and code readability. Let me know if you have any other questions!
Related benchmarks:
`Array.slice(-1)[0]` vs `Array[Array.length]`
`Array.slice(-1)[0]` vs `Array[Array.length]` for 10000 length
slice vs length-1
`array.slice(-1)[0]` vs `array[array.length - 1]`
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?