Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator test 65652445
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.concat
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
spread operator
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] var other = [ 1, 2, ...params ]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.concat
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **What is tested:** The provided benchmark tests two approaches to concatenate arrays in JavaScript: 1. `Array.prototype.concat()` 2. The new ES6 spread operator (`...`) **Options compared:** * `Array.prototype.concat()` vs Spread Operator (`...`) **Pros and Cons of each approach:** ### Array.prototype.concat() Pros: * Wide support across different browsers and versions * Can handle large arrays by taking advantage of browser optimizations Cons: * Requires a function call, which can incur overhead in some cases * Returns a new array object, which can lead to memory allocation issues if not handled carefully ### Spread Operator (`...`) Pros: * Concise syntax, making code more readable and expressive * Does not require a function call, reducing overhead * Allows for more flexible handling of arrays, including shallow copies Cons: * Less supported in older browsers (pre-ES6) * May lead to performance issues if used with large arrays or complex data structures **Library usage:** None of the provided benchmark test cases explicitly use any external libraries. **Special JS feature/syntax:** The spread operator (`...`) is a new syntax introduced in ES6. It allows for concise array concatenation and copying, making code more readable and expressive. **Other alternatives:** 1. `Array.prototype.push()`: While not the most efficient approach, it can be used to concatenate arrays by pushing elements from one array into another. 2. `Array.prototype.slice()` followed by `Array.prototype.concat()`: This approach involves creating a new array using `slice()` and then concatenating it with another array using `concat()`. 3. Other approaches like using `Set` or `Map` data structures for more complex use cases. Keep in mind that these alternatives might not be as efficient or readable as the spread operator, but they can still be used in certain situations. Overall, the provided benchmark provides valuable insight into the performance differences between two common JavaScript array concatenation approaches.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
concat 2 arrays: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator real
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on large array
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on small array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?