Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
foreach vs for loop - kostia
(version: 0)
foreach vs for loop
Comparing performance of:
for loop vs foreach loop
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
function generateTestArray() { const arr = [Array(50000).keys()]; return arr; }
Tests:
for loop
const array = generateTestArray(); console.time("for"); for(let i=0; i<array.length; i++) {} console.time("for end");
foreach loop
const array = generateTestArray(); console.time("foreach"); array.forEach(value=>{}); console.time("foreach end");
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
for loop
foreach loop
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
gemma2:9b
, generated one year ago):
This benchmark compares the performance of two ways to iterate over an array in JavaScript: using a `for` loop and using the `forEach` method. **Options Compared:** * **`for` loop:** A traditional loop that explicitly iterates through indices of an array. This gives you direct control over the index and allows for more complex iteration logic if needed. * **`forEach` method:** A higher-level function built into arrays in JavaScript. It takes a callback function as an argument, which is executed for each element in the array. **Pros and Cons:** * **`for` loop:** * **Pros:** Can be more performant in some cases due to potentially fewer function calls overhead compared to `forEach`. Offers greater control over the iteration process. * **Cons:** More verbose syntax, requires explicit index management. * **`forEach` method:** * **Pros:** Simpler and more concise syntax, avoids manual index management. * **Cons:** Can be slightly less performant than a `for` loop in some scenarios due to the function call overhead. **Considerations:** * **Readability:** `forEach` is generally considered more readable for simple iterations. * **Performance:** The performance difference between `for` loops and `forEach` is often minimal, especially for small arrays. Microbenchmarks like this one are useful for identifying these subtle differences in specific scenarios. **Alternatives:** * **`for...of` loop:** A newer way to iterate over iterables (including arrays) in JavaScript. It's even more concise than `forEach` and often performs similarly or better. Let me know if you have any other questions about this benchmark or JavaScript iteration techniques!
Related benchmarks:
Iteration through array; of vs forEach
foreach vs for...of
for of vs forEach with console log
For loop vs <Array>.forEach() vs for...of loop
forEach vs for of 7
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?