Benchmark: hash-sum vs object-hash2

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/hash-sum@2.0.0/hash-sum.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/object-hash@2.0.3/dist/object_hash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var context1 = {show: true, icon: '/point.png', size: 10, color: '#333'}

var context2 = {show: true, icon: '/point.png', size: 10, color: '#333'}

Tests:

Sum
sum(context1) === sum(context2)
Object-hash
objectHash(context1) === objectHash(context2)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Sum
Object-hash

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of MeasureThat.net and understand what's being tested in this benchmark.

**Benchmark Overview**

MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. In this case, we have two individual test cases: "Sum" and "Object-hash". These test cases compare the performance of two different approaches: `hash-sum` and `object-hash`.

**Options Compared**

The options being compared are:

1. **Hash Sum**: This approach uses a hashing function to calculate the sum of an object's properties. It's likely using a library like `hash-sum`.
2. **Object-Hash**: This approach uses a different hashing function, specifically designed for objects. It's also likely using a library like `object-hash`.

**Pros and Cons**

Here are some pros and cons of each approach:

1. **Hash Sum**:
	* Pros: Simple to implement, widely supported by JavaScript engines.
	* Cons: May not be optimized for performance, can lead to collisions (different objects returning the same hash).
2. **Object-Hash**:
	* Pros: Optimized for performance, designed specifically for object hashing, reducing collisions.
	* Cons: May require more complex implementation, potentially less widely supported by JavaScript engines.

**Library Descriptions**

Both libraries are used to implement the respective approaches:

1. **hash-sum**: A lightweight library that provides a simple way to calculate the sum of an object's properties using a hashing function.
2. **object-hash**: A specialized library designed specifically for object hashing, which uses a more efficient algorithm to reduce collisions.

**Special JS Features or Syntax**

There are no specific JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that MeasureThat.net allows users to test various JavaScript features and libraries.

**Other Alternatives**

If you're looking for alternative libraries for object hashing, some options include:

1. **Lodash**: A popular utility library that provides a `pick` function for selecting specific properties from an object.
2. **Immutable.js**: A library designed for functional programming, which includes a `hash` function for calculating the sum of an object's properties.

In summary, this benchmark compares the performance of two approaches to calculate the sum of an object's properties: `hash-sum` and `object-hash`. The `object-hash` approach is optimized for performance but may require more complex implementation. MeasureThat.net allows users to test various JavaScript libraries and features, providing a useful platform for benchmarking and comparing different approaches.

Related benchmarks:

hash-sum vs object-hash2 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Sum vs Object-hash

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Sum

Object-hash

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):