Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Concat Vs Spread [eungwang]
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
concat vs spread
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
concat
const firstArray = Array.from({length : 10000}, (v,i) => ({id : i, name : `firstArray${i}`})) const secondArray = Array.from({length : 10000}, (v,i) => ({id : i, name : `secondArray${i}`})) const result = firstArray.concat(secondArray);
spread
const firstArray = Array.from({length : 10000}, (v,i) => ({id : i, name : `firstArray${i}`})) const secondArray = Array.from({length : 10000}, (v,i) => ({id : i, name : `secondArray${i}`})) const result = [...firstArray,secondArray]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
concat
spread
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what's being tested in the provided benchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is defined by two test cases: "concat" and "spread". The script preparation code for both tests is identical, using `Array.from` to create two arrays with 10,000 elements each, and then concatenating or spreading these arrays. The purpose of this benchmark is to compare the performance of two different methods for joining arrays in JavaScript. **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: 1. **Concat**: Using the `concat` method to join the two arrays. 2. **Spread**: Using the spread operator (`...`) to join the two arrays. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** **Concat** Pros: * Widely supported by older browsers * Can be used with older JavaScript versions (pre-ES6) * Simple and straightforward syntax Cons: * May not be as efficient as other methods for large datasets, as it creates a new array. * Can lead to memory issues if dealing with very large datasets. **Spread** Pros: * More efficient than `concat` for large datasets, as it uses a more optimized algorithm. * Eliminates the need to create intermediate arrays. * Supports modern JavaScript versions (ES6+). Cons: * May not be supported by older browsers or lower JavaScript versions. * Requires an understanding of the spread operator (`...`) syntax. **Library Used** None. The benchmark only uses built-in JavaScript features and functions. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The use of `Array.from` is a modern JavaScript feature introduced in ES6, which creates a new array from an iterable source. This is also used in the spread operator (`...`). There is no special syntax being tested here; rather, it's about comparing two different approaches to joining arrays. **Other Alternatives** In addition to `concat` and `spread`, other methods for joining arrays include: * Using a loop to iterate over each array and append elements to an accumulator array. * Using the `reduce()` method to join the arrays together. * Using a library like Lodash's `uniqBy` or `flatten` functions. Keep in mind that these alternatives may not be as optimized as the spread operator, but they can still provide a good way to compare their performance with `concat`. In summary, this benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two methods for joining arrays in JavaScript: `concat` and `spread`. The use of modern features like `Array.from` and the spread operator makes it an interesting test case for understanding the nuances of JavaScript's array manipulation capabilities.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
ES6 Array concat vs spread operator
Array concat vs spread operator vs push performance
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator 12
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?